Comparing Completion Time, Accuracy, and Satisfaction in Virtual Reality vs. Desktop Implementation of the Common Coordinate Framework Registration User Interface (CCF RUI)
AI-generated Key Points
- The Registration User Interface (RUI) was developed for stakeholders in the Human Biomolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP) to register tissue blocks by size, position, and orientation.
- RUI has been used by tissue mapping centers across the HuBMAP consortium to register a total of 45 kidney, spleen, and colon tissue blocks.
- A user study involving 42 human subjects was conducted to compare the performance of three setups: traditional 2D Desktop implementation, VR Tabletop, and VR Standup.
- Results showed that while VR Tabletop and VR Standup users were about three times as fast and about a third more accurate in terms of rotation than 2D Desktop users, there were no significant differences for position accuracy.
- The 2D Desktop version is well-suited for registering tissue blocks at a speed and accuracy that meets the needs of experts performing tissue dissection. It is also cheaper, easier to learn, and more practical for wet-bench environments than the VR setups.
- Future work includes testing interventions to help users improve their performance during the experiment by running a study with a “reflective” phase where the user sees a visualization of their own performance data from previous tasks before completing a second set of tasks.
Authors: Andreas Bueckle, Kilian Buehling, Patrick C. Shih, Katy Börner
Abstract: Working with organs and tissue blocks is an essential task in medical environments. In order to prepare specimens for further analysis, wet-bench workers must dissect tissue and collect spatial metadata. The Registration User Interface (RUI) was developed to allow stakeholders in the Human Biomolecular Atlas Program (HuBMAP) to register tissue blocks by size, position, and orientation. The RUI has been used by tissue mapping centers across the HuBMAP consortium to register a total of 45 kidney, spleen, and colon tissue blocks. In this paper, we compare three setups for registering one 3D tissue block object to another 3D reference organ (target) object. The first setup is a 2D Desktop implementation featuring a traditional screen, mouse, and keyboard interface. The remaining setups are both virtual reality (VR) versions of the RUI: VR Tabletop, where users sit at a physical desk; VR Standup, where users stand upright. We ran a user study involving 42 human subjects completing 14 increasingly difficult and then 30 identical tasks and report position accuracy, rotation accuracy, completion time, and satisfaction. We found that while VR Tabletop and VR Standup users are about three times as fast and about a third more accurate in terms of rotation than 2D Desktop users, there are no significant differences for position accuracy. The performance values for the 2D Desktop version (22.6 seconds per task, 5.9 degrees rotation, and 1.32 mm position accuracy) confirm that the 2D Desktop interface is well-suited for registering tissue blocks at a speed and accuracy that meets the needs of experts performing tissue dissection. In addition, the 2D Desktop setup is cheaper, easier to learn, and more practical for wet-bench environments than the VR setups. All three setups were implemented using the Unity game engine, and study materials were made available, alongside videos documenting our setups.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.