Gyro-Kinematic Ages for around 30,000 Kepler Stars

AI-generated keywords: Stellar Ages Kinematics Gyro-Kinematic Ages Rotation Periods Machine Learning

AI-generated Key Points

  • Stellar ages are important for understanding the evolution of stars, exoplanets, and the Milky Way galaxy
  • Determining the age of low-mass stars such as K and M dwarfs is challenging due to their slow evolution on the main sequence and faintness
  • A recent study by Kiman et al. calculated gyro-kinematic ages for around 30,000 Kepler stars using their rotation and kinematic properties
  • The study applied an age-velocity-dispersion relation (AVR) to estimate average stellar ages for groupings of coeval stars
  • The method was able to estimate ages for clusters and asteroseismic stars with an RMS of 1.22 Gyr and 0.26 Gyr respectively
  • Using their Astraea machine learning algorithm which predicts rotation periods they suggested a new selection criterion (a weight of 0.15) to increase the size of the McQuillian et al. (2014) catalog of Kepler rotation periods by up to 25%
  • Using predicted rotation periods allowed them to estimate gyro-kinematic ages for stars without measured rotation periods
  • The study provides a valuable approach to estimating stellar ages for low-mass stars using their kinematics properties
  • This method has potential applications in furthering our understanding of stellar evolution and galactic history
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yuxi (Lucy), Lu, Ruth Angus, Jason L. Curtis, Trevor J. David, Rocio Kiman

arXiv: 2102.01772v1 - DOI (astro-ph.SR)
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Estimating stellar ages is important for advancing our understanding of stellar and exoplanet evolution and investigating the history of the Milky Way. However, ages for low-mass stars are hard to infer as they evolve slowly on the main sequence. In addition, empirical dating methods are difficult to calibrate for low-mass stars as they are faint. In this work, we calculate ages for Kepler F, G, and crucially K and M dwarfs, using their rotation and kinematic properties. We apply the simple assumption that the velocity dispersion of stars increases over time and adopt an age--velocity--dispersion relation (AVR) to estimate average stellar ages for groupings of coeval stars. We calculate the vertical velocity dispersion of stars in bins of absolute magnitude, temperature, rotation period, and Rossby number and then convert velocity dispersion to kinematic age via an AVR. Using this method, we estimate gyro-kinematic ages for 29,949 Kepler stars with measured rotation periods. We are able to estimate ages for clusters and asteroseismic stars with an RMS of 1.22 Gyr and 0.26 Gyr respectively. With our Astraea machine learning algorithm, which predicts rotation periods, we suggest a new selection criterion (a weight of 0.15) to increase the size of the McQuillian et al. (2014) catalog of Kepler rotation periods by up to 25%. Using predicted rotation periods, we estimated gyro-kinematic ages for stars without measured rotation periods and found promising results by comparing 12 detailed age--element abundance trends with literature values.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Feb. 2021

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2102.01772v1

Stellar ages are crucial for understanding the evolution of stars and exoplanets, as well as investigating the history of our Milky Way galaxy. However, determining the age of low-mass stars such as K and M dwarfs remains challenging due to their slow evolution on the main sequence and faintness. In a recent study by Kiman et al., gyro-kinematic ages were calculated for around 30,000 Kepler stars using their rotation and kinematic properties. The study applied an age-velocity-dispersion relation (AVR) to estimate average stellar ages for groupings of coeval stars. The assumption was made that velocity dispersion increases over time, allowing for conversion of velocity dispersion to kinematic age via an AVR. Vertical velocity dispersion was calculated in bins of absolute magnitude, temperature, rotation period and Rossby number to estimate gyro-kinematic ages for 29,949 Kepler stars with measured rotation periods. The results showed that the method was able to estimate ages for clusters and asteroseismic stars with an RMS of 1.22 Gyr and 0.26 Gyr respectively. Additionally, using their Astraea machine learning algorithm which predicts rotation periods they suggested a new selection criterion (a weight of 0.15) to increase the size of the McQuillian et al. (2014) catalog of Kepler rotation periods by up to 25%. Using predicted rotation periods allowed them to estimate gyro-kinematic ages for stars without measured rotation periods. Furthermore Kiman et al., in prep., studied all the stars in a cluster using this method and found promising results when comparing detailed age-element abundance trends with literature values. Overall this study provides a valuable approach to estimating stellar ages for low-mass stars using their kinematics properties and highlights its potential applications in furthering our understanding of stellar evolution and galactic history.
Created on 01 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 1

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.