Persuasive Natural Language Generation -- A Literature Review
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Literature review on Persuasive Natural Language Generation (NLG)
- Explores use of NLG to detect and generate persuasive texts
- Focuses on determinants of persuasion in five business-focused categories
- Linguistic appropriacy
- Logical argumentation
- Tools and datasets
- Objective is to enhance persuasiveness of existing messages using NLG techniques
- Review highlights key aspects within each category based on previous research findings
- Analyzes seventy-seven articles to outline existing knowledge and progress in the field
- Proposes a research agenda for further investigation of persuasive NLG
- Provides valuable insights into leveraging NLG for generating persuasive texts across domains
- Contributes to understanding NLG's potential for generating persuasive content
Authors: Sebastian Duerr, Peter A. Gloor
Abstract: This literature review focuses on the use of Natural Language Generation (NLG) to automatically detect and generate persuasive texts. Extending previous research on automatic identification of persuasion in text, we concentrate on generative aspects through conceptualizing determinants of persuasion in five business-focused categories: benevolence, linguistic appropriacy, logical argumentation, trustworthiness, tools and datasets. These allow NLG to increase an existing message's persuasiveness. Previous research illustrates key aspects in each of the above mentioned five categories. A research agenda to further study persuasive NLG is developed. The review includes analysis of seventy-seven articles, outlining the existing body of knowledge and showing the steady progress in this research field.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.