Platform-Mediated Competition

AI-generated keywords: Within-group externalities two-sided platform markets network effects comparative statics welfare implications

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Cross-group externalities and network effects are well-studied factors in two-sided platform markets
  • Within-group externalities arising from many-to-many matchings on a platform have received less attention
  • Such externalities occur when the value to an agent of matching with another agent depends on the set of agents with which the latter is matched
  • The paper characterizes platform-optimal matchings in a general model of many-to-many matching with within-group externalities
  • The author proves a set of comparative statics results for optimal matchings and demonstrates how these can be used to analyze welfare effects resulting from changes such as vertical integration by the platform, horizontal mergers between firms on one side of the market, and modifications in the platform's information structure
  • The paper explores market structure and regulation in two detailed applications: monopolistic competition between firms on a retail platform like Amazon, and how multi-channel video program distributors (MVPDs) negotiate transfer fees with television channels and bundle them to sell to individuals
  • This research sheds light on an important yet understudied aspect of many-to-many matching platforms: within-group externalities.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Quitzé Valenzuela-Stookey

Abstract: Cross-group externalities and network effects in two-sided platform markets shape market structure and competition policy, and are the subject of extensive study. Less understood are the within-group externalities that arise when the platform designs many-to-many matchings: the value to agent $i$ of matching with agent $j$ may depend on the set of agents with which $j$ is matched. These effects are present in a wide range of settings in which firms compete for individuals' custom or attention. I characterize platform-optimal matchings in a general model of many-to-many matching with within-group externalities. I prove a set of comparative statics results for optimal matchings, and show how these can be used to analyze the welfare effects various changes, including vertical integration by the platform, horizontal mergers between firms on one side of the market, and changes in the platform's information structure. I then explore market structure and regulation in two in-depth applications. The first is monopolistic competition between firms on a retail platform such as Amazon. The second is a multi-channel video program distributor (MVPD) negotiating transfer fees with television channels and bundling these to sell to individuals.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Nov. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2011.03879v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the world of two-sided platform markets, cross-group externalities and network effects are well-studied factors that shape market structure and competition policy. However, within-group externalities arising from many-to-many matchings on a platform have received less attention. These externalities occur when the value to an agent of matching with another agent depends on the set of agents with which the latter is matched. Such effects are present in various settings where firms compete for individuals' attention or custom. In this paper, Quitzé Valenzuela-Stookey characterizes platform-optimal matchings in a general model of many-to-many matching with within-group externalities. The author proves a set of comparative statics results for optimal matchings and demonstrates how these can be used to analyze welfare effects resulting from changes such as vertical integration by the platform, horizontal mergers between firms on one side of the market, and modifications in the platform's information structure. The paper also explores market structure and regulation in two detailed applications. The first application involves monopolistic competition between firms on a retail platform like Amazon. The second application examines how multi-channel video program distributors (MVPDs) negotiate transfer fees with television channels and bundle them to sell to individuals. Overall, this paper sheds light on an important yet understudied aspect of many-to-many matching platforms: within-group externalities. By providing insights into optimal matchings and their associated welfare implications under different scenarios, this research contributes to our understanding of competition policy in two-sided markets.
Created on 20 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.