Tree species effects on topsoil carbon stock and concentration are mediated by tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability at the global scale

AI-generated keywords: Tree species Carbon sequestration Soil properties Environmental factors Climate change

AI-generated Key Points

  • Study focuses on tree species selection in forest management and its impact on carbon sequestration in soil
  • Quantitative synthesis of 850 observations from field studies conducted
  • Factors such as tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability affect topsoil carbon concentration and stock
  • Broadleaved trees, arbuscular mycorrhizal associations, or N-fixing trees have lower forest floor carbon stocks but higher mineral soil carbon concentration/stock
  • Tree species traits affect carbon dynamics through changes in soil properties like microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen
  • Environmental factors like latitude, mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP), and forest stand age mediate the effects of tree species on mineral soil carbon dynamics
  • Insights into how specific traits of tree species influence forest floor carbon stock and mineral soil carbon concentration/stock at a global scale
  • Implications for informed decision making in forest management or afforestation efforts for climate change mitigation.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yan Peng, Inger Kappel Schmidt, Haifeng Zheng, Petr Heděnec, Luciana Ruggiero Bachega, Kai Yue, Fuzhong Wu, Lars Vesterdal

In: Forest Ecology and Management. 2020 ; Vol. 478
arXiv: 2011.03767v3 - DOI (q-bio.QM)
Authors Accepted Manuscript
License: CC BY-SA 4.0

Abstract: Selection of appropriate tree species is an important forest management decision that may affect sequestration of carbon (C) in soil. However, information about tree species effects on soil C stocks at the global scale remains unclear. Here, we quantitatively synthesized 850 observations from field studies that were conducted in a common garden or monoculture plantations to assess how tree species type (broadleaf vs. conifer), mycorrhizal association (arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) vs. ectomycorrhizal (ECM)), and N-fixing ability (N-fixing vs. non-N-fixing), directly and indirectly, affect topsoil (with a median depth of 10 cm) C concentration and stock, and how such effects were influenced by environmental factors such as geographical location and climate. We found that (1) tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability were all important factors affecting soil C, with lower forest floor C stocks under broadleaved (44%), AM (39%), or N-fixing (28%) trees respectively, but higher mineral soil C concentration (11%, 22%, and 156%) and stock (9%, 10%, and 6%) under broadleaved, AM, and N-fixing trees respectively; (2) tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability affected forest floor C stock and mineral soil C concentration and stock directly or indirectly through impacting soil properties such as microbial biomass C and nitrogen; (3) tree species effects on mineral soil C concentration and stock were mediated by latitude, MAT, MAP, and forest stand age. These results reveal how tree species and their specific traits influence forest floor C stock and mineral soil C concentration and stock at a global scale. Insights into the underlying mechanisms of tree species effects found in our study would be useful to inform tree species selection in forest management or afforestation aiming to sequester more atmospheric C in soil for mitigation of climate change.

Submitted to arXiv on 07 Nov. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2011.03767v3

This study focuses on the selection of tree species in forest management decisions and its impact on carbon sequestration in soil. The researchers conducted a quantitative synthesis of 850 observations from field studies to assess how different factors, such as tree species type (broadleaf vs. conifer), mycorrhizal association (arbuscular mycorrhizal vs. ectomycorrhizal), and N-fixing ability (N-fixing vs. non-N-fixing), directly and indirectly affect topsoil carbon concentration and stock. They also examined how these effects were influenced by environmental factors like geographical location and climate. The findings revealed that tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability all played important roles in soil carbon dynamics. Forest floor carbon stocks were lower under broadleaved trees, arbuscular mycorrhizal associations or N-fixing trees compared to their counterparts; however, mineral soil carbon concentration and stock were higher under broadleaved trees, arbuscular mycorrhizal associations or N-fixing trees. The study also found that tree species type, mycorrhizal association, and N-fixing ability affected forest floor carbon stock and mineral soil carbon concentration/stock directly or indirectly through changes in soil properties such as microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen. Furthermore, the researchers investigated the influence of latitude, mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP) and forest stand age on the relationship between tree species traits and mineral soil carbon concentration/stock. They discovered that these environmental factors mediated the effects of tree species on mineral soil carbon dynamics. Overall, this study provides insights into how specific traits of tree species influence forest floor carbon stock and mineral soil carbon concentration/stock at a global scale. These findings have implications for informed decision making in forest management or afforestation efforts aimed at enhancing atmospheric carbon sequestration in soils for climate change mitigation.
Created on 23 Nov. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.