Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2011.03016v1

In the paper titled "Ethics in the Software Development Process: From Codes of Conduct to Ethical Deliberation," authors Jan Gogoll, Niina Zuber, Severin Kacianka, Timo Greger, Alexander Pretschner, and Julian Nida-Rümelin discuss the increasing importance of software systems in our lives and the ethical responsibilities that software engineers and their companies face. The authors aim to distinguish between ethical considerations that can be addressed by individual software engineers and those that fall within the realm of business ethics. Traditionally, ethical issues within software development have been tackled through the publication of Codes of Ethics and Conduct. However, the authors argue that these codes are insufficient in providing normative guidance for software development. They analyze the normative features of Codes of Ethics in software engineering and highlight how their value-based approach may hinder their effectiveness from a normative perspective. The paper emphasizes that Codes of Conduct cannot replace ethical deliberation because they lack specific guidance due to their underdetermined nature. This lack of orientation leads to reactive behaviors such as "cherry-picking," "risk of indifference," "ex-post orientation," and a reliance on gut feelings. To address this issue, the authors propose implementing ethical deliberation within software development teams as a solution. Overall, this paper sheds light on the limitations of existing Codes of Ethics in providing normative guidance for software engineers. It highlights the need for ethical deliberation within development teams to effectively address ethical issues arising from software systems' increasing influence in society.

• - Increasing importance of software systems in our lives
• - Ethical responsibilities of software engineers and companies
• - Distinguishing between individual ethical considerations and business ethics
• - Insufficiency of Codes of Ethics in providing normative guidance for software development
• - Analysis of normative features and limitations of Codes of Ethics
• - Lack of specific guidance leading to reactive behaviors
• - Proposal to implement ethical deliberation within software development teams as a solution
• - Need for ethical deliberation to effectively address ethical issues arising from software systems' influence in society

Software systems are becoming more and more important in our everyday lives. This means that they are playing a bigger role in how we do things and how we interact with the world. People who create software, like engineers and companies, have a responsibility to make sure that their software is ethical. This means that it should be fair, honest, and not harm anyone. Sometimes, what is considered ethical for an individual person might be different from what is considered ethical for a business or company. It's important to understand the difference between personal ethics and business ethics. The rules or guidelines that tell us what is right or wrong in software development (like a Code of Ethics) are not always enough to guide us in making good decisions. We need to look closely at these rules and think about their strengths and weaknesses. We also need more specific guidance so that we can make better choices instead of just reacting to problems as they come up. One solution could be to have discussions about ethics within teams of people who develop software. This way, everyone can talk about what they think is right or wrong and work together to make better decisions. It's really important for us to think about ethics when it comes to software because it has such a big impact on our society. We need to make sure that the technology we use is fair, safe, and doesn't hurt anyone."

Ethics in Software Development: From Codes of Conduct to Ethical Deliberation

In the modern world, software systems have become increasingly important and influential. As such, software engineers and their companies must consider ethical responsibilities when developing these systems. In the paper titled "Ethics in the Software Development Process: From Codes of Conduct to Ethical Deliberation," authors Jan Gogoll, Niina Zuber, Severin Kacianka, Timo Greger, Alexander Pretschner, and Julian Nida-Rümelin discuss how traditional codes of ethics are insufficient for providing normative guidance for software development. They propose that ethical deliberation should be implemented within development teams as a solution to address ethical issues arising from software systems' increasing influence in society.

Codes of Ethics and Their Limitations

For many years now, ethical issues within software engineering have been addressed through the publication of Codes of Ethics and Conduct (CoE). These CoEs provide general guidelines on how developers should behave ethically while developing software systems. However, according to the authors’ analysis of existing CoEs in this field, they lack specific guidance due to their underdetermined nature. This lack of orientation leads to reactive behaviors such as “cherry-picking” (selecting only certain parts that fit one's own opinion), “risk of indifference” (not taking any action at all), “ex-post orientation” (only reacting after an incident has occurred) and a reliance on gut feelings instead of rational decision making processes.

The Need for Ethical Deliberation

To address this issue with CoEs not providing sufficient normative guidance for software engineers, the authors propose implementing ethical deliberation within development teams as a solution. By engaging in open discussions about potential ethical implications before implementation takes place - rather than relying solely on pre-existing codes - developers can better understand what is expected from them ethically when creating new technologies or improving existing ones. Furthermore, by involving stakeholders such as customers or users into these discussions early on during development processes allows for more informed decisions that take into account multiple perspectives which may otherwise be overlooked if left up to individual judgement alone.

Conclusion

Overall, this paper sheds light on the limitations of existing Codes of Ethics in providing normative guidance for software engineers when it comes to addressing ethical issues arising from their work. It highlights the need for ethical deliberation within development teams so that these considerations can be taken into account before implementation takes place instead relying solely on pre-existing codes which may not always provide sufficient direction or insight into potential implications associated with new technologies or improvements made upon existing ones.