Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2011.01060v1

The researchers introduce a new dataset called 2WikiMultiHopQA for Multi-hop Question Answering that utilizes both structured and unstructured data from Wikipedia and Wikidata. The dataset aims to challenge reasoning and inference skills by requiring models to read multiple paragraphs in order to answer complex questions. Unlike existing datasets, 2WikiMultiHopQA provides comprehensive evidence information that outlines the reasoning path from the question to the answer, enhancing transparency and evaluation of model performance. The generation of question-answer pairs in the dataset is carefully designed using a pipeline and templates that ensure multi-hop reasoning steps are necessary for answering each question. Logical rules are employed to create natural yet challenging questions that demand multi-hop reasoning abilities from models. By leveraging structured data from Wikidata, the researchers guarantee that questions are not only realistic but also require advanced reasoning capabilities. The tasks formulated in this study include answer prediction, sentence-level supporting facts (SFs) prediction, and evidence generation. Evaluation metrics such as exact match (EM) and F1 score are used to assess model performance across these tasks. Joint metrics are introduced to evaluate the overall capacity of models by combining precision and recall for answer spans, SFs, and evidence. Furthermore, the dataset includes four types of questions: comparison, inference, compositional, and bridge comparison. Bridge questions involve a bridge entity connecting two paragraphs and represent a subtype of inference and compositional questions. To ensure data quality, post-processing techniques were applied to balance yes/no questions and eliminate ambiguous cases. Additionally, distractor paragraphs were collected using bigram tf-idf similarity measures to provide context for each question. Dataset statistics were established through a benchmark setting using a single-hop model for train-dev-test splits with five-fold cross-validation. Overall, this study contributes a valuable resource for evaluating multi-hop QA models by providing a challenging dataset with detailed explanations for predictions and rigorous evaluation criteria. The full dataset along with baseline models can be accessed on GitHub for further research purposes.

• - Introduction of a new dataset called 2WikiMultiHopQA for Multi-hop Question Answering
• - Dataset challenges reasoning and inference skills by requiring models to read multiple paragraphs
• - Comprehensive evidence information provided in the dataset enhances transparency and evaluation of model performance
• - Question-answer pairs are carefully designed to ensure multi-hop reasoning steps are necessary
• - Logical rules create natural yet challenging questions that demand multi-hop reasoning abilities
• - Structured data from Wikidata guarantees realistic questions that require advanced reasoning capabilities
• - Tasks include answer prediction, SFs prediction, and evidence generation with evaluation metrics like EM and F1 score
• - Joint metrics introduced to evaluate overall model capacity by combining precision and recall for various aspects
• - Four types of questions included: comparison, inference, compositional, and bridge comparison
• - Post-processing techniques applied for data quality assurance including balancing yes/no questions and eliminating ambiguous cases
• - Distractor paragraphs collected using bigram tf-idf similarity measures to provide context for each question
• - Dataset statistics established through benchmark setting using single-hop model for train-dev-test splits with five-fold cross-validation.

Summary1. A new dataset called 2WikiMultiHopQA is introduced for answering questions that require reading multiple paragraphs. 2. The dataset challenges reasoning and inference skills by providing detailed evidence information. 3. Questions are designed to require multiple steps of reasoning, with logical rules creating challenging yet natural questions. 4. The dataset includes tasks like predicting answers, supporting facts, and generating evidence, evaluated using metrics like EM and F1 score. 5. Different question types are included, and techniques are used to ensure data quality and provide context for each question. Definitions- Dataset: A collection of information or data organized in a specific way for a particular purpose. - Reasoning: Thinking logically to come to a conclusion or solve a problem. - Inference: Drawing conclusions based on available evidence or information. - Evidence: Information that supports or proves something to be true. - Metrics: Standards of measurement used to evaluate performance or success. - Precision: How close measurements are to each other when repeated under the same conditions. - Recall: Ability to retrieve relevant information from memory when needed. - Distractor: Something that distracts attention or leads away from the main point.

Introduction: Multi-hop question answering (QA) is a challenging task that requires models to read and comprehend multiple paragraphs in order to answer complex questions. While existing datasets have provided valuable resources for evaluating QA models, they often lack transparency and comprehensive evidence information. In response, researchers have introduced a new dataset called 2WikiMultiHopQA, which aims to address these limitations by utilizing both structured and unstructured data from Wikipedia and Wikidata. Dataset Creation: The creation of the 2WikiMultiHopQA dataset involved careful planning and design to ensure its effectiveness in evaluating multi-hop QA models. The first step was the selection of source material from Wikipedia articles, which were then linked with corresponding entities from Wikidata. This allowed for the incorporation of structured data into the dataset, making it more realistic and challenging for models. Next, a pipeline was developed to generate question-answer pairs using templates that required multi-hop reasoning steps for answering each question. This ensured that all questions in the dataset would demand advanced reasoning abilities from models. Logical rules were also employed during this process to create natural yet challenging questions. Tasks: The 2WikiMultiHopQA dataset consists of three main tasks: answer prediction, sentence-level supporting facts (SFs) prediction, and evidence generation. These tasks evaluate different aspects of model performance such as predicting correct answers spans, identifying relevant supporting facts within paragraphs, and generating evidence paths that explain how the model arrived at its answer. Evaluation Metrics: To assess model performance on these tasks, traditional metrics such as exact match (EM) and F1 score are used. However, joint metrics are also introduced to evaluate overall model capacity by combining precision and recall for answer spans, SFs, and evidence paths. Question Types: The dataset includes four types of questions: comparison questions that require comparing two entities or concepts; inference questions that involve drawing conclusions based on given information; compositional questions that combine multiple pieces of information; and bridge comparison questions that require identifying a bridge entity connecting two paragraphs. These question types provide a diverse range of challenges for models to tackle, making the dataset more comprehensive and realistic. Data Quality: To ensure the quality of the dataset, post-processing techniques were applied to balance yes/no questions and eliminate ambiguous cases. Additionally, distractor paragraphs were collected using bigram tf-idf similarity measures to provide context for each question. This helps prevent models from simply memorizing answers and encourages them to use reasoning skills. Dataset Statistics: The researchers established benchmark statistics for the 2WikiMultiHopQA dataset by using a single-hop model on train-dev-test splits with five-fold cross-validation. This allows for fair comparisons between different models and serves as a baseline for future research. Conclusion: In conclusion, the 2WikiMultiHopQA dataset provides a valuable resource for evaluating multi-hop QA models by addressing limitations of existing datasets such as lack of transparency and comprehensive evidence information. Its carefully designed creation process ensures challenging yet natural questions that require advanced reasoning abilities from models. The inclusion of structured data from Wikidata also adds an extra layer of complexity, making it more realistic. With its detailed explanations for predictions and rigorous evaluation criteria, this dataset is an important contribution to the field of multi-hop QA research. It is freely available on GitHub along with baseline models for further exploration and development in this area.