Making Retrieval-Augmented Language Models Robust to Irrelevant Context

AI-generated keywords: Natural Language Processing

AI-generated Key Points

Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) in Natural Language Processing are effective in creating factual, efficient, and up-to-date systems.
The key challenge for RALMs is to ensure that retrieved information enhances model performance when relevant and does not hinder it when irrelevant, especially in scenarios requiring multi-hop reasoning.
Recent studies have shown instances where retrieval augmentation can decrease performance, leading to errors cascading through the system.
Two methods were proposed to address this challenge: a baseline approach filtering out irrelevant passages using a natural language inference (NLI) model, and a novel approach generating training data for fine-tuning language models with both relevant and irrelevant contexts.
Empirical results demonstrated that training models on just 1,000 examples could help them handle irrelevant contexts robustly while maintaining high performance on relevant ones.
Efforts were made towards developing Large Language Models (LLMs) with controllable memory capabilities to ignore irrelevant context by training on smaller sets of questions and automatically generated data.
Simple NLI models were found effective in increasing robustness against irrelevant context at the cost of discarding some relevant passages when training data is limited.

Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Ori Yoran, Tomer Wolfson, Ori Ram, Jonathan Berant

arXiv: 2310.01558v1 - DOI (cs.CL)

License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) hold promise to produce language understanding systems that are are factual, efficient, and up-to-date. An important desideratum of RALMs, is that retrieved information helps model performance when it is relevant, and does not harm performance when it is not. This is particularly important in multi-hop reasoning scenarios, where misuse of irrelevant evidence can lead to cascading errors. However, recent work has shown that retrieval augmentation can sometimes have a negative effect on performance. In this work, we present a thorough analysis on five open-domain question answering benchmarks, characterizing cases when retrieval reduces accuracy. We then propose two methods to mitigate this issue. First, a simple baseline that filters out retrieved passages that do not entail question-answer pairs according to a natural language inference (NLI) model. This is effective in preventing performance reduction, but at a cost of also discarding relevant passages. Thus, we propose a method for automatically generating data to fine-tune the language model to properly leverage retrieved passages, using a mix of relevant and irrelevant contexts at training time. We empirically show that even 1,000 examples suffice to train the model to be robust to irrelevant contexts while maintaining high performance on examples with relevant ones.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Oct. 2023

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2310.01558v1

Comprehensive Summary
Key points
Layman's Summary
Blog article

In the field of Natural Language Processing, retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) have shown promise in creating systems that are factual, efficient, and up-to-date. The key challenge for RALMs is to ensure that retrieved information enhances model performance when relevant and does not hinder it when irrelevant. This becomes crucial in scenarios requiring multi-hop reasoning, where the misuse of irrelevant evidence can lead to errors cascading through the system. Recent studies have highlighted instances where retrieval augmentation can actually decrease performance. In response to this issue, a comprehensive analysis was conducted on five open-domain question answering benchmarks to identify cases where retrieval negatively impacts accuracy. Two methods were proposed to address this challenge: firstly, a baseline approach that filters out retrieved passages not supported by question-answer pairs according to a natural language inference (NLI) model. While effective in preventing performance reduction, this method also risks discarding relevant passages. To overcome this limitation, a novel approach was introduced to automatically generate training data for fine-tuning language models to effectively utilize retrieved passages by exposing them to a mix of relevant and irrelevant contexts during training. Empirical results demonstrated that even with just 1,000 examples, the model could be trained to handle irrelevant contexts robustly while maintaining high performance on relevant ones. Additionally, efforts were made towards developing Large Language Models (LLMs) with controllable memory capabilities that enable them to ignore irrelevant context. Unlike previous approaches which relied on over 200K training examples, the focus here was on training with a smaller set of questions and automatically generated data. The study also emphasized multi-hop question-answering settings where retrievers are utilized multiple times. In conclusion, the research highlighted the importance of making RALMs robust against irrelevant retrieved context to enhance overall performance in various tasks. Simple NLI models were found effective in increasing robustness at the cost of discarding some relevant passages when training data is limited. By training models on as few as 1,000 examples and exposing them to diverse contexts during training, significant improvements in handling irrelevant information were observed while maintaining high performance levels overall.

- Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) in Natural Language Processing are effective in creating factual, efficient, and up-to-date systems.
- The key challenge for RALMs is to ensure that retrieved information enhances model performance when relevant and does not hinder it when irrelevant, especially in scenarios requiring multi-hop reasoning.
- Recent studies have shown instances where retrieval augmentation can decrease performance, leading to errors cascading through the system.
- Two methods were proposed to address this challenge: a baseline approach filtering out irrelevant passages using a natural language inference (NLI) model, and a novel approach generating training data for fine-tuning language models with both relevant and irrelevant contexts.
- Empirical results demonstrated that training models on just 1,000 examples could help them handle irrelevant contexts robustly while maintaining high performance on relevant ones.
- Efforts were made towards developing Large Language Models (LLMs) with controllable memory capabilities to ignore irrelevant context by training on smaller sets of questions and automatically generated data.
- Simple NLI models were found effective in increasing robustness against irrelevant context at the cost of discarding some relevant passages when training data is limited.

Summary1. Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) help create smart systems that know a lot of facts and are very good at finding information quickly. 2. RALMs need to make sure the information they find makes them even better at their job, not worse, especially when they have to think about many things at once. 3. Sometimes adding more information can actually make these models make mistakes and mess up how they work. 4. People came up with two ways to fix this problem: one way is to use a special model to filter out unimportant information, and another way is to train the models with both good and bad examples. 5. By training these models on just a small number of examples, they can get really good at ignoring wrong information while still being great at using the right information. Definitions- Retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs): Smart systems that use retrieved information to improve their performance in understanding language. - Factual: Information based on facts or reality. - Efficient: Doing something well without wasting time or energy. - Up-to-date: Having the latest or most recent information available. - Multi-hop reasoning: Thinking about multiple steps or pieces of information in order to solve a problem or answer a question. - Empirical results: Findings based on observation or experience rather than theory alone. - Large Language Models (LLMs): Advanced language models with high memory capabilities for processing vast amounts of data efficiently. - Robustly:

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a branch of artificial intelligence that focuses on enabling computers to understand and process human language. In recent years, retrieval-augmented language models (RALMs) have emerged as a promising approach in NLP, showing potential in creating systems that are factual, efficient, and up-to-date. However, one key challenge for RALMs is ensuring that retrieved information enhances model performance when relevant and does not hinder it when irrelevant. To address this issue, a research paper titled "Retrieval-Augmented Language Models: Addressing Irrelevant Contexts" was published by a team of researchers from the University of Washington and AI2. The paper presents an in-depth analysis of five open-domain question answering benchmarks to identify cases where retrieval negatively impacts accuracy. It also proposes two methods to overcome this challenge. The first method proposed by the researchers is a baseline approach that filters out retrieved passages not supported by question-answer pairs according to a natural language inference (NLI) model. This method aims to prevent performance reduction caused by irrelevant context but risks discarding relevant passages as well. To overcome this limitation, the researchers introduced a novel approach that involves automatically generating training data for fine-tuning language models. This method exposes the models to a mix of relevant and irrelevant contexts during training, allowing them to effectively utilize retrieved passages while maintaining high performance levels on relevant ones. Surprisingly, even with just 1,000 examples for training data, the model showed significant improvements in handling irrelevant information. Furthermore, the study also focused on developing Large Language Models (LLMs) with controllable memory capabilities that enable them to ignore irrelevant context. Unlike previous approaches which relied on over 200K training examples, this study aimed at training LLMs with smaller sets of questions and automatically generated data. The research highlighted the importance of making RALMs robust against irrelevant retrieved context to enhance overall performance in various tasks such as open-domain question answering. The results showed that simple NLI models can increase robustness at the cost of discarding some relevant passages when training data is limited. However, by training models on as few as 1,000 examples and exposing them to diverse contexts during training, significant improvements in handling irrelevant information were observed while maintaining high performance levels overall. The study also emphasized the importance of considering multi-hop question-answering settings where retrievers are utilized multiple times. In such scenarios, it becomes crucial to ensure that retrieved information does not lead to errors cascading through the system. In conclusion, this research paper sheds light on the challenges faced by RALMs in handling irrelevant context and proposes effective solutions to overcome them. It highlights the need for further research in developing robust language models that can effectively utilize retrieved information without compromising performance. With advancements in NLP technology, retrieval-augmented language models have great potential in various applications such as virtual assistants, chatbots, and search engines. By addressing issues related to irrelevant context, these systems can become more accurate and efficient in understanding human language and providing relevant responses.

Created on 30 Mar. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.