An Introduction to Electrocatalyst Design using Machine Learning for Renewable Energy Storage

AI-generated keywords: Renewable Energy Storage Electrocatalysts Machine Learning Open Catalyst Project OC20 Density Functional Theory

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The world needs scalable and cost-effective solutions for renewable energy storage to meet increasing energy demands and reduce climate change.
  • Energy storage is necessary to transfer power from times of peak generation to peak demand, which may require storing power for hours, days, or even months.
  • One potential solution is the conversion of renewable energy into other fuels such as hydrogen or methane, but this requires cost-effective solutions for running electrochemical reactions.
  • Finding low-cost electrocatalysts that can drive these reactions at high rates is one of the biggest challenges in this area.
  • Quantum mechanical simulations using density functional theory can be used to test and evaluate new catalyst structures, but the high computational cost limits the number of structures that can be tested.
  • Machine learning offers a promising approach to efficiently approximate these calculations and find effective electrocatalysts.
  • The Open Catalyst Project OC20 dataset is used for model training in this study.
  • Machine learning models have been developed using this dataset and have demonstrated good performance in predicting reaction energies and identifying promising catalysts.
  • Developing low-cost electrocatalysts for renewable energy storage is important, and machine learning can accelerate progress towards achieving this goal.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: C. Lawrence Zitnick, Lowik Chanussot, Abhishek Das, Siddharth Goyal, Javier Heras-Domingo, Caleb Ho, Weihua Hu, Thibaut Lavril, Aini Palizhati, Morgane Riviere, Muhammed Shuaibi, Anuroop Sriram, Kevin Tran, Brandon Wood, Junwoong Yoon, Devi Parikh, Zachary Ulissi

arXiv: 2010.09435v1 - DOI (cond-mat.mtrl-sci)
27 pages

Abstract: Scalable and cost-effective solutions to renewable energy storage are essential to addressing the world's rising energy needs while reducing climate change. As we increase our reliance on renewable energy sources such as wind and solar, which produce intermittent power, storage is needed to transfer power from times of peak generation to peak demand. This may require the storage of power for hours, days, or months. One solution that offers the potential of scaling to nation-sized grids is the conversion of renewable energy to other fuels, such as hydrogen or methane. To be widely adopted, this process requires cost-effective solutions to running electrochemical reactions. An open challenge is finding low-cost electrocatalysts to drive these reactions at high rates. Through the use of quantum mechanical simulations (density functional theory), new catalyst structures can be tested and evaluated. Unfortunately, the high computational cost of these simulations limits the number of structures that may be tested. The use of machine learning may provide a method to efficiently approximate these calculations, leading to new approaches in finding effective electrocatalysts. In this paper, we provide an introduction to the challenges in finding suitable electrocatalysts, how machine learning may be applied to the problem, and the use of the Open Catalyst Project OC20 dataset for model training.

Submitted to arXiv on 14 Oct. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2010.09435v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The world's increasing energy needs and the urgent need to reduce climate change require scalable and cost-effective solutions for renewable energy storage. As we rely more on intermittent power sources like wind and solar, there is a growing need for energy storage to transfer power from times of peak generation to peak demand, which may require storing power for hours, days, or even months. One potential solution that can scale up to nation-sized grids is the conversion of renewable energy into other fuels such as hydrogen or methane. However, this process requires cost-effective solutions for running electrochemical reactions. One of the biggest challenges in this area is finding low-cost electrocatalysts that can drive these reactions at high rates. Quantum mechanical simulations using density functional theory can be used to test and evaluate new catalyst structures. Unfortunately, the high computational cost of these simulations limits the number of structures that can be tested. To address this challenge, machine learning offers a promising approach to efficiently approximate these calculations and find effective electrocatalysts. This paper provides an introduction to the challenges involved in finding suitable electrocatalysts and how machine learning can be applied to solve this problem. The Open Catalyst Project OC20 dataset is used for model training in this study. The authors discuss how machine learning models have been developed using this dataset and describe their performance in predicting reaction energies and identifying promising catalysts. Overall, this paper highlights the importance of developing low-cost electrocatalysts for renewable energy storage and demonstrates how machine learning can accelerate progress towards achieving this goal.
Created on 07 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.