Rainfall-Runoff Prediction at Multiple Timescales with a Single Long Short-Term Memory Network

AI-generated keywords: Multi-Timescale LSTM Flood Forecasting Long Short-Term Memory Networks Meteorological Forcings Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTMs) are successful in predicting daily discharge
  • Accurate forecasting of short but extreme flood peaks is required in many practical scenarios
  • Naively training an LSTM on hourly data results in long input sequences that make learning difficult and computationally expensive
  • Multi-Timescale LSTM (MTS-LSTM) architectures jointly predict multiple timescales within one model, processing long-past inputs at a single temporal resolution and branching out into each individual timescale for more recent input steps
  • MTS-LSTM architectures were tested on 516 basins across the continental United States and benchmarked against the US National Water Model, showing computational efficiency without any loss in accuracy compared to naive prediction with a distinct LSTM per timescale
  • The multi-timescale LSTM can process different input variables at different timescales, which is especially relevant to operational applications where the lead time of meteorological forcings depends on their temporal resolution.
  • Authors of the study include Martin Gauch, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Grey Nearing, Jimmy Lin and Sepp Hochreiter.
  • The paper titled "Rainfall-Runoff Prediction at Multiple Timescales with a Single Long Short-Term Memory Network" was published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences journal in 2021.
  • This research provides significant insights into improving flood forecasting accuracy by using MTS-LSTM models that can handle multiple timescales efficiently without compromising prediction quality or computational efficiency.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Martin Gauch, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Grey Nearing, Jimmy Lin, Sepp Hochreiter

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 2045-2062, 2021

Abstract: Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTMs) have been applied to daily discharge prediction with remarkable success. Many practical scenarios, however, require predictions at more granular timescales. For instance, accurate prediction of short but extreme flood peaks can make a life-saving difference, yet such peaks may escape the coarse temporal resolution of daily predictions. Naively training an LSTM on hourly data, however, entails very long input sequences that make learning hard and computationally expensive. In this study, we propose two Multi-Timescale LSTM (MTS-LSTM) architectures that jointly predict multiple timescales within one model, as they process long-past inputs at a single temporal resolution and branch out into each individual timescale for more recent input steps. We test these models on 516 basins across the continental United States and benchmark against the US National Water Model. Compared to naive prediction with a distinct LSTM per timescale, the multi-timescale architectures are computationally more efficient with no loss in accuracy. Beyond prediction quality, the multi-timescale LSTM can process different input variables at different timescales, which is especially relevant to operational applications where the lead time of meteorological forcings depends on their temporal resolution.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Oct. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2010.07921v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The use of Long Short-Term Memory Networks (LSTMs) has been highly successful in predicting daily discharge. However, many practical scenarios require more granular predictions, such as accurate forecasting of short but extreme flood peaks that may escape the coarse temporal resolution of daily predictions. Naively training an LSTM on hourly data results in long input sequences that make learning difficult and computationally expensive. To address this issue, a study proposes two Multi-Timescale LSTM (MTS-LSTM) architectures that jointly predict multiple timescales within one model. These models process long-past inputs at a single temporal resolution and branch out into each individual timescale for more recent input steps. The MTS-LSTM architectures were tested on 516 basins across the continental United States and benchmarked against the US National Water Model. Compared to naive prediction with a distinct LSTM per timescale, the multi-timescale architectures are computationally more efficient without any loss in accuracy. Moreover, beyond prediction quality, the multi-timescale LSTM can process different input variables at different timescales which is especially relevant to operational applications where the lead time of meteorological forcings depends on their temporal resolution. The authors of the study include Martin Gauch, Frederik Kratzert, Daniel Klotz, Grey Nearing, Jimmy Lin and Sepp Hochreiter. Their paper titled "Rainfall-Runoff Prediction at Multiple Timescales with a Single Long Short-Term Memory Network" was published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences journal in 2021. This research provides significant insights into improving flood forecasting accuracy by using MTS-LSTM models that can handle multiple timescales efficiently without compromising prediction quality or computational efficiency.
Created on 09 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.