How to Hijack Twitter: Online Polarisation Strategies of Germany's Political Far-Right

AI-generated keywords: Hashjacking Polarization Digital Political Communication AfD Logistic Regression

AI-generated Key Points

  • The study examines the digital political communication strategy of the German far-right party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) and their potential use of a "hashjacking" strategy.
  • Right-wing politicians, along with their supporters and retweeters, actively and effectively polarize discourse not just by using their own party hashtags but also by "hashjacking" the political party hashtags of other established parties.
  • This strategy has contributed significantly to the success of right-wing parties in online platforms and elections.
  • Understanding the success of right-wing parties as a direct consequence of their digital political communication strategy rather than solely as a result of external factors such as migration is important.
  • The research analyzes thirty randomly selected retweets and compares cluster assignment with content sentiment towards AfD.
  • A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.92 indicates that cluster assignment and content's sentiment are well aligned.
  • Logistic regression models show high association between the pro-AfD cluster and contra-clusters of all other parties, indicating that users in these clusters are more likely to be located in the pro-AfD cluster than users in other clusters on average.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Philipp Darius, Fabian Stephany

7 pages, 2 figures, 1 table
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: With a network approach, we examine the case of the German far-right party Alternative f\"ur Deutschland (AfD) and their potential use of a "hashjacking" strategy. Our findings suggest that right-wing politicians (and their supporters/retweeters) actively and effectively polarise the discourse not just by using their own party hashtags, but also by "hashjacking" the political party hashtags of other established parties. The results underline the necessity to understand the success of right-wing parties, online and in elections, not entirely as a result of external effects (e.g. migration), but as a direct consequence of their digital political communication strategy.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Oct. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2010.05546v1

The study "How to Hijack Twitter: Online Polarisation Strategies of Germany's Political Far-Right" examines the digital political communication strategy of the German far-right party Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) and their potential use of a "hashjacking" strategy. The findings suggest that right-wing politicians, along with their supporters and retweeters, actively and effectively polarize discourse not just by using their own party hashtags but also by "hashjacking" the political party hashtags of other established parties. The research reveals that this strategy has contributed significantly to the success of right-wing parties in online platforms and elections. The study also highlights the importance of understanding the success of right-wing parties as a direct consequence of their digital political communication strategy rather than solely as a result of external factors such as migration. Additionally, the research analyzes thirty randomly selected retweets and compares cluster assignment with content sentiment towards AfD. A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.92 indicates that cluster assignment and content's sentiment are well aligned. Furthermore, logistic regression models show high association between the pro-AfD cluster and contra-clusters of all other parties, indicating that users in these clusters are more likely to be located in the pro-AfD cluster than users in other clusters on average. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into how right-wing parties use social media platforms to polarize discourse and gain support among voters.
Created on 02 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.