AI summary · arXiv: 2010.05510v1 · astro-ph.GA

The infrared-radio correlation of star-forming galaxies is strongly M$_{\star}$-dependent but nearly redshift-invariant since z$\sim$4

I. Delvecchio, E. Daddi, M. T. Sargent, M. J. Jarvis, D. Elbaz, S. Jin, D. Liu, I. H. Whittam,

and 20 more authorsH. Algera, R. Carraro, C. D'Eugenio, J. Delhaize, B. Kalita, S. Leslie, D. Cs. Molnar, M. Novak, I. Prandoni, V. Smolcic, Y. Ao, M. Aravena, F. Bournaud, J. D. Collier, S. M. Randriamampandry, Z. Randriamanakoto, G. Rodighiero, J. Schober, S. V. White, G. Zamorani

Original paper · DOI Submitted to arXiv on 12 Oct. 2020 Submitted to A&A. 30 pages, 26 figures, 3 tables. Comments are welcome License: NONEXCLUSIVE-DISTRIB 1.0

The essentials

  • The study focuses on the infrared-radio correlation (IRRC) in star-forming galaxies
  • IRRC is used as a calibration tool for estimating star formation rates (SFR) based on radio emission
  • The authors re-calibrate the IRRC by considering both stellar mass and redshift
  • They analyze a sample of over 400,000 star-forming galaxies in the COSMOS field
  • Stacked deep infrared/sub-mm and radio images are used within each bin defined by stellar mass and redshift
  • The results show that the IRRC primarily depends on stellar mass, with more massive galaxies exhibiting lower q$_{TIR}$ values (the logarithm of the IRRC)
  • There is also a weaker secondary dependence on redshift
  • An analytical expression is provided to describe this relationship: q$_{TIR}$(M$_{*}$,z)=(2.646±0.024)×(1+z)^(-0.023±0.008)-(0.148±0.013)×(log M_{*}/M_{\odot}-10)
  • When accounting for the UV dust-uncorrected contribution to total SFR, there is a further steepening of the q$_{TIR}$ dependence on stellar mass
  • These findings highlight the need for novel M$_{*}$ dependent recipes when using radio emission as a proxy for SFR

Key points written by AI: they may contain errors, check them against the paper.

AI-generated keywords: Infrared-Radio Correlation (IRRC)

Read further

  • Comprehensive Summary
  • Layman's Summary
  • Blog article
  • Original abstract
This study focuses on the infrared-radio correlation (IRRC) in star-forming galaxies, which is the ratio between total infrared and radio luminosity. The IRRC has been used as a calibration tool for estimating star formation rates (SFR) based on radio emission. Previous research has shown that the IRRC evolves with redshift, but the underlying reasons for this evolution are not well understood. In this study, the authors re-calibrate the IRRC by considering both stellar mass (M$_{*}$) and redshift. They analyze a sample of over 400,000 star-forming galaxies in the COSMOS field, selected based on their (NUV-r)/(r-J) colors and spanning redshifts from 0.1 to 4.5. Within each bin defined by M$_{*}$ and redshift, they stack deep infrared/sub-mm and radio images. The stacked infrared spectral energy distributions are fitted using templates for typical star-forming galaxies and infrared AGN sources. To ensure accuracy, they employ a recursive approach to remove potential radio AGN candidates. The results show that the IRRC primarily depends on stellar mass, with more massive galaxies exhibiting lower q$_{TIR}$ values (the logarithm of the IRRC). There is also a weaker secondary dependence on redshift; an analytical expression is provided to describe this relationship: q$_{TIR}$(M$_{*}$,z)=(2.646±0.024)×(1+z)^(-0.023±0.008)-(0.148±0.013)×(log M_{*}/M_{\odot}-10). Additionally, when accounting for the UV dust-uncorrected contribution to the total SFR, there is a further steepening of the q$_{TIR}$ dependence on stellar mass; this decrease in q$_{TIR}$ for more massive galaxies may be linked to higher star formation rate surface density which leads to larger cosmic ray scale heights. These findings highlight the need for novel M$_{*}$ dependent recipes when using radio emission as a proxy for SFR; such recipes will be crucial for accurately measuring SFR in future ultra deep radio surveys, particularly for low SFR and low M${_*} $galaxies.

Was this synthesis useful?

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Figures and plots

Ask about a figure by number or use its question button to request visual analysis. Up to two figures and four image panels per question. Values read from plots are approximate; check the original data.

AI assistant instructions?

Tools for this paper

Explain it differently 3 free rewrites left today
Save to a collection Group papers in collections to compare them, chat with them and export them. Create a free account Log in

Advanced tools Premium

For researchers who follow a field closely: citation alerts, journal-club slides, version comparison and Zotero export. Discover Premium

Zotero
Citation alerts
Journal club Premium+ Slides to present it
For journalists Premium+ Press kit and hype check

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.