Helpfulness as a Key Metric of Human-Robot Collaboration

AI-generated keywords: Helpfulness Metric Human-Robot Collaboration Task-Oriented Trustworthiness

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Authors address the need to assess the roles of robotic teammates in interactions
  • Focus on measuring the helpfulness of a robotic partner for a given task
  • Propose a clear, concise task-oriented metric for evaluating helpfulness
  • Discuss properties and implications of this metric for planning interactions with humans
  • Provide concrete examples from different domains to illustrate the concept of helpfulness
  • Present preliminary results demonstrating practical application of the metric
  • Contribute to understanding human-robot interaction by providing a quantitative measure of helpfulness
  • Offer insights into evaluating the role and contribution of robotic teammates in various domains
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Richard G. Freedman, Steven J. Levine, Brian C. Williams, Shlomo Zilberstein

Accepted for presentation at the AAAI 2020 Fall Symposium Series, in the symposium for Artificial Intelligence for Human-Robot Interaction: Trust & Explainability in Artificial Intelligence for Human-Robot Interaction

Abstract: As robotic teammates become more common in society, people will assess the robots' roles in their interactions along many dimensions. One such dimension is effectiveness: people will ask whether their robotic partners are trustworthy and effective collaborators. This begs a crucial question: how can we quantitatively measure the helpfulness of a robotic partner for a given task at hand? This paper seeks to answer this question with regards to the interactive robot's decision making. We describe a clear, concise, and task-oriented metric applicable to many different planning and execution paradigms. The proposed helpfulness metric is fundamental to assessing the benefit that a partner has on a team for a given task. In this paper, we define helpfulness, illustrate it on concrete examples from a variety of domains, discuss its properties and ramifications for planning interactions with humans, and present preliminary results.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Oct. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2010.04914v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "Helpfulness as a Key Metric of Human-Robot Collaboration," authors Richard G. Freedman, Steven J. Levine, Brian C. Williams, and Shlomo Zilberstein address the increasing presence of robotic teammates in society and the need to assess their roles in interactions. Specifically, they focus on the dimension of effectiveness and aim to answer the question of how we can quantitatively measure the helpfulness of a robotic partner for a given task. The authors propose a clear, concise metric that is task-oriented and can be applied to various planning and execution paradigms. This metric serves as an essential tool for evaluating the benefit that a robotic partner brings to a team in accomplishing a specific task. The concept of helpfulness is defined and illustrated through concrete examples from different domains. The paper also discusses the properties and implications of this helpfulness metric for planning interactions with humans. By considering factors such as trustworthiness and effectiveness, it provides insights into how robotic teammates can effectively collaborate with humans. Furthermore, preliminary results are presented to demonstrate the practical application of the proposed metric. These results offer valuable insights into assessing the impact of robotic decision-making on human-robot collaboration. Overall, this paper contributes to our understanding of human-robot interaction by providing a quantitative measure of helpfulness in collaborative tasks. It offers valuable insights into evaluating the role and contribution of robotic teammates in various domains and provides a foundation for future research in this field.
Created on 02 Jan. 2024

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.