Evaluating Quality of Chatbots and Intelligent Conversational Agents

AI-generated keywords: Chatbot Quality Attributes Evaluation AHP

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Chatbots are intelligent software agents that respond to natural language input
  • They have become easier to train and implement due to open source code availability, development platforms, and SaaS options
  • Chatbots can enhance customer experiences and support learning, but they can also be used for social harm
  • The paper explores quality issues related to chatbot development and implementation
  • It examines attributes such as usability, accuracy, reliability, security/privacy concerns
  • Different approaches for assessing chatbot quality are reviewed, including surveys or interviews with users or experts in the field
  • The paper proposes a quality assessment method using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)
  • The proposed method aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing chatbot quality.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Nicole M. Radziwill, Morgan C. Benton

Software Quality Professional, June 2017

Abstract: Chatbots are one class of intelligent, conversational software agents activated by natural language input (which can be in the form of text, voice, or both). They provide conversational output in response, and if commanded, can sometimes also execute tasks. Although chatbot technologies have existed since the 1960s and have influenced user interface development in games since the early 1980s, chatbots are now easier to train and implement. This is due to plentiful open source code, widely available development platforms, and implementation options via Software as a Service (SaaS). In addition to enhancing customer experiences and supporting learning, chatbots can also be used to engineer social harm - that is, to spread rumors and misinformation, or attack people for posting their thoughts and opinions online. This paper presents a literature review of quality issues and attributes as they relate to the contemporary issue of chatbot development and implementation. Finally, quality assessment approaches are reviewed, and a quality assessment method based on these attributes and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is proposed and examined.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Apr. 2017

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1704.04579v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Evaluating Quality of Chatbots and Intelligent Conversational Agents" by Nicole M. Radziwill and Morgan C. Benton explores the quality issues and attributes associated with chatbot development and implementation. Chatbots are intelligent software agents that respond to natural language input, such as text or voice, providing conversational output and executing tasks when commanded. While chatbot technologies have been around since the 1960s and have influenced user interface development in games since the early 1980s, they have become easier to train and implement due to open source code availability, development platforms, and Software as a Service (SaaS) options. In addition to enhancing customer experiences and supporting learning, chatbots can also be used for social harm such as spreading rumors or misinformation or attacking individuals for expressing their thoughts online. The paper presents a literature review of quality issues related to chatbot development and implementation. It examines various attributes that contribute to chatbot quality including usability, accuracy, reliability, security/privacy concerns etc. Furthermore, the paper reviews different approaches for assessing chatbot quality such as surveys or interviews with users or experts in the field. It proposes a quality assessment method based on these attributes using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The proposed method aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation framework for assessing the quality of chatbots. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the contemporary issue of chatbot development and implementation by discussing quality issues, attributes, and proposing a novel approach for evaluating chatbot quality using AHP.
Created on 26 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.