Extracting a Knowledge Base of Mechanisms from COVID-19 Papers

AI-generated keywords: COVID-19 Knowledge Base Mechanisms Interdisciplinary Research Automated Tool

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • COVID-19 pandemic has generated a vast amount of scientific literature
  • Difficulty for researchers to navigate and find relevant information
  • Study aimed to construct a knowledge base (KB) of mechanisms
  • Mechanisms encompass various activities, functions, and causal relations across different disciplines
  • KB built using a comprehensive schema that balances relevance and breadth
  • Model trained to extract mechanism relations from scientific papers
  • KB outperformed PubMed search in supporting interdisciplinary scientific search over COVID-19 literature
  • Automated tool more effective in finding useful knowledge within COVID-19 literature
  • Paper titled "Extracting a Knowledge Base of Mechanisms from COVID-19 Papers" accepted at NAACL 2021 as a long paper
  • Authors include Tom Hope, Aida Amini, David Wadden, Madeleine van Zuylen, Sravanthi Parasa, Eric Horvitz, Daniel Weld, Roy Schwartz and Hannaneh Hajishirzi
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Tom Hope, Aida Amini, David Wadden, Madeleine van Zuylen, Sravanthi Parasa, Eric Horvitz, Daniel Weld, Roy Schwartz, Hannaneh Hajishirzi

Accepted to NAACL 2021 (long paper). Tom Hope and Aida Amini made an equal contribution. Data and code: https://git.io/JUhv7

Abstract: The COVID-19 pandemic has spawned a diverse body of scientific literature that is challenging to navigate, stimulating interest in automated tools to help find useful knowledge. We pursue the construction of a knowledge base (KB) of mechanisms -- a fundamental concept across the sciences encompassing activities, functions and causal relations, ranging from cellular processes to economic impacts. We extract this information from the natural language of scientific papers by developing a broad, unified schema that strikes a balance between relevance and breadth. We annotate a dataset of mechanisms with our schema and train a model to extract mechanism relations from papers. Our experiments demonstrate the utility of our KB in supporting interdisciplinary scientific search over COVID-19 literature, outperforming the prominent PubMed search in a study with clinical experts.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Oct. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2010.03824v3

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The COVID-19 pandemic has generated a vast amount of scientific literature, making it difficult for researchers to navigate and find relevant information. To address this challenge, the authors of this study aimed to construct a knowledge base (KB) of mechanisms, which are fundamental concepts that encompass various activities, functions, and causal relations across different scientific disciplines. These mechanisms range from cellular processes to economic impacts. To build the KB, the researchers developed a comprehensive schema that strikes a balance between relevance and breadth. They annotated a dataset of mechanisms using this schema and trained a model to extract mechanism relations from scientific papers. The experiments conducted by the authors demonstrated the utility of their KB in supporting interdisciplinary scientific search over COVID-19 literature. In fact, their KB outperformed the widely used PubMed search in a study involving clinical experts. This indicates that their automated tool is more effective in finding useful knowledge within the vast body of COVID-19 literature. The authors provide additional context by sharing the details of their publication. The paper titled "Extracting a Knowledge Base of Mechanisms from COVID-19 Papers" was accepted at NAACL 2021 as a long paper. The authors include Tom Hope, Aida Amini, David Wadden, Madeleine van Zuylen, Sravanthi Parasa, Eric Horvitz, Daniel Weld, Roy Schwartz and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. Overall, this study presents an innovative approach to extracting valuable information from scientific papers and constructing a knowledge base of mechanisms related to COVID-19. The findings highlight the potential of automated tools in facilitating interdisciplinary research and improving access to relevant knowledge during times of crisis like the ongoing pandemic.
Created on 23 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.