## A Comparative Study Between a Classical and Optimal Controller for a Quadrotor

### AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

- The paper presents a comparative study between two controllers for a linearized quadrotor model: PID and LQR.
- The authors derive a linear mathematical model using Newtonian and Euler's laws to simplify the dynamic model of a quadrotor.
- A state-space model is developed from these equations which is then used to simulate the control algorithms for the quadrotor.
- The authors compare the performance of PID and LQR controllers under identical initial conditions using Simulink simulations.
- LQR proves to be more robust for a quadrotor than PID, highlighting that it is an optimal control regulator that can provide better performance than classical controllers like PID.
- Optimal control regulators like LQR can offer better performance than classical controllers in certain scenarios.
- The approach of deriving a simplified mathematical model using fundamental principles of physics can also be useful for researchers working on similar problems in robotics and control systems engineering.

**Authors:**
Prathamesh Saraf,
Manan Gupta,
Alivelu Manga Parimi

**Abstract:** This paper presents a simulation-based comparison between the two controllers, Proportional Integral Derivative (PID), a classical controller and Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR), an optimal controller, for a linearized quadrotor model. To simplify an otherwise complicated dynamic model of a quadrotor, we derive a linear mathematical model using Newtonian and Euler's laws and applying basic principles of physics. This derivation gives the equations that govern the motion of a quadrotor, both concerning the body frame and the inertial frame. A state-space model is developed, which is then used to simulate the control algorithms for the quadrotor. Apart from the classic PID control algorithm, LQR is an optimal control regulator, and it is more robust for a quadrotor. Both the controllers are simulated in Simulink under the same initial conditions and show a satisfactory response.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.