## Brownian snails with removal: epidemics in diffusing populations

### AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

- The paper introduces two stochastic models for the spread of infection through a spatially-distributed population
- Individuals move continuously according to independent diffusion processes, similar to frog models but with the added action of removal and the fact that frogs jump whereas snails slither
- The disease may pass from an infected individual to an uninfected individual when they are sufficiently close, and infected individuals are permanently removed at a given rate $\alpha$
- The two models studied in this paper are called the "delayed diffusion" model and the "diffusion" model
- Conditions are established under which the disease infects only finitely many individuals almost surely using a perturbative argument
- There exists a critical value $\alpha_c\in(0,\infty)$ for the survival of an epidemic in the delayed diffusion model, which depends on various parameters such as population size and movement rates
- If $\alpha<\alpha_c$, then there is no epidemic outbreak; otherwise, there is an outbreak with positive probability.
- This paper provides valuable insights into how epidemics spread through spatially-distributed populations using SIR-type models with Brownian motion dynamics.
- The results have important implications for public health policy and disease control strategies in real-world scenarios where infections can spread rapidly across large areas due to human mobility patterns.

**Authors:**
Geoffrey R. Grimmett,
Zhongyang Li

**Abstract:** Two stochastic models of susceptible/infected/removed (SIR) type are introduced for the spread of infection through a spatially-distributed population. Individuals are initially distributed at random in space, and they move continuously according to independent diffusion processes. The disease may pass from an infected individual to an uninfected individual when they are sufficiently close. Infected individuals are permanently removed at some given rate $\alpha$. Such processes are reminiscent of so-called frog models, but differ through the action of removal, as well as the fact that frogs jump whereas snails slither. Two models are studied here, termed the `delayed diffusion' and the `diffusion' models. In the first, individuals are stationary until they are infected, at which time they begin to move; in the second, all individuals start to move at the initial time $0$. Using a perturbative argument, conditions are established under which the disease infects a.s. only finitely many individuals. It is proved for the delayed diffusion model that there exists a critical value $\alpha_c\in(0,\infty)$ for the survival of the epidemic.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.