Multi-Loss Weighting with Coefficient of Variations

AI-generated keywords: Multi-Loss Weighting Coefficient of Variations Monocular Depth Estimation Semantic Segmentation Computationally Efficient

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Optimizing an objective function defined as a weighted linear combination of multiple losses is common in machine learning and computer vision.
  • Final performance of such models depends on choosing the correct relative weights for these losses.
  • Traditional methods involve setting weights using an extensive grid search, which can be computationally expensive.
  • The paper proposes a novel weighting scheme based on the coefficient of variations to address this issue.
  • The proposed method incorporates a measure of uncertainty to balance the losses in multi-loss problems such as monocular depth estimation and semantic segmentation.
  • This study focuses on single-task multi-loss problems and shows that many loss weighting methods in literature that focus on multi-task approaches do not work for those single-tasks.
  • The authors demonstrate empirically that their approach is valid for depth estimation and semantic segmentation across multiple datasets.
  • The proposed method sets the weights based on properties observed while training the model and evolves during training without requiring another optimization step, making it computationally efficient compared to traditional methods.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Rick Groenendijk, Sezer Karaoglu, Theo Gevers, Thomas Mensink

Paper was accepted at the IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision 2021 (WACV2021)

Abstract: Many interesting tasks in machine learning and computer vision are learned by optimising an objective function defined as a weighted linear combination of multiple losses. The final performance is sensitive to choosing the correct (relative) weights for these losses. Finding a good set of weights is often done by adopting them into the set of hyper-parameters, which are set using an extensive grid search. This is computationally expensive. In this paper, we propose a weighting scheme based on the coefficient of variations and set the weights based on properties observed while training the model. The proposed method incorporates a measure of uncertainty to balance the losses, and as a result the loss weights evolve during training without requiring another (learning based) optimisation. In contrast to many loss weighting methods in literature, we focus on single-task multi-loss problems, such as monocular depth estimation and semantic segmentation, and show that multi-task approaches for loss weighting do not work on those single-tasks. The validity of the approach is shown empirically for depth estimation and semantic segmentation on multiple datasets.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Sep. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2009.01717v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of machine learning and computer vision, optimizing an objective function that is defined as a weighted linear combination of multiple losses is a common approach for many interesting tasks. However, the final performance of such models is highly dependent on choosing the correct relative weights for these losses. Traditionally, finding a good set of weights involves adopting them into the set of hyper-parameters and setting them using an extensive grid search, which can be computationally expensive. In this paper titled "Multi-Loss Weighting with Coefficient of Variations," authors Rick Groenendijk, Sezer Karaoglu, Theo Gevers, and Thomas Mensink propose a novel weighting scheme based on the coefficient of variations to address this issue. The proposed method incorporates a measure of uncertainty to balance the losses in multi-loss problems such as monocular depth estimation and semantic segmentation. Unlike many loss weighting methods in literature that focus on multi-task approaches, this study focuses on single-task multi-loss problems and shows that these approaches do not work for those single-tasks. The authors demonstrate empirically that their approach is valid for depth estimation and semantic segmentation across multiple datasets. The proposed method sets the weights based on properties observed while training the model and evolves during training without requiring another optimization step. This eliminates the need for an extensive grid search to find optimal hyper-parameters, making it computationally efficient compared to traditional methods. Overall, this paper presents a promising solution to improve model performance by providing an effective way to choose optimal weightings for multiple losses in single-task scenarios in machine learning and computer vision applications without sacrificing computational efficiency.
Created on 15 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.