Directly imaged exoplanets in reflected starlight. The importance of knowing the planet radius

AI-generated keywords: Exoplanets Reflected Starlight Radius Atmosphere MCMC

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study investigates the information content in reflected-starlight spectra of exoplanets
  • Focuses on Barnard's Star b, a candidate super-Earth with an assumed radius 0.6 times that of Neptune, an atmosphere dominated by H$_2$-He, and a CH$_4$ volume mixing ratio of 5$\cdot$10$^{-3}$
  • A model of the exoplanet is set up with seven parameters including its radius, atmospheric methane abundance, and basic properties of a cloud layer
  • Synthetic spectra are generated at zero phase (full disk illumination) from 500 to 900 nm and spectral resolution R$\sim$125-225
  • Using an MCMC-based retrieval methodology, they analyze which planet/atmosphere parameters can be inferred from the measured spectrum and the theoretical correlations amongst them
  • If the planet radius is known, they can generally discriminate between cloud-free and cloudy atmospheres and constrain the methane abundance to within two orders of magnitude
  • Without a radius determination it is challenging to discern whether the planet has clouds and estimates on methane abundance degrade significantly
  • Even without precise knowledge of an exoplanet's radius they can still constrain it to within a factor of two for all cases explored
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Óscar Carrión-González, Antonio García Muñoz, Juan Cabrera, Szilárd Csizmadia, Nuno C. Santos, Heike Rauer

A&A 640, A136 (2020)
arXiv: 2006.08784v1 - DOI (astro-ph.EP)
Accepted for publication in A&A. 22 pages, 6 Tables, 16 figures. The abstract has been shortened to meet arXiv requirements

Abstract: We have investigated the information content in reflected-starlight spectra of exoplanets. We specify our analysis to Barnard's Star b candidate super-Earth, for which we assume a radius 0.6 times that of Neptune, an atmosphere dominated by H$_2$-He, and a CH$_4$ volume mixing ratio of 5$\cdot$10$^{-3}$. The main conclusions of our study are however planet-independent. We set up a model of the exoplanet described by seven parameters including its radius, atmospheric methane abundance and basic properties of a cloud layer. We generate synthetic spectra at zero phase (full disk illumination) from 500 to 900 nm and spectral resolution R$\sim$125-225. We simulate a measured spectrum with a simplified, wavelength-independent noise model at Signal-to-Noise ratio S/N=10. With an MCMC-based retrieval methodology, we analyse which planet/atmosphere parameters can be inferred from the measured spectrum and the theoretical correlations amongst them. We consider limiting cases in which the planet radius is either known or completely unknown, and intermediate cases in which the planet radius is partly constrained. If the planet radius is known, we can generally discriminate between cloud-free and cloudy atmospheres, and constrain the methane abundance to within two orders of magnitude. If the planet radius is unknown, new correlations between model parameters occur and the accuracy of the retrievals decreases. Without a radius determination, it is challenging to discern whether the planet has clouds, and the estimates on methane abundance degrade. However, we find the planet radius is constrained to within a factor of two for all the cases explored. Having a priori information on the planet radius, even if approximate, helps improve the retrievals. We urge exoplanet detection efforts to extend the population of long-period planets with mass and radius determinations.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Jun. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2006.08784v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study, "Directly imaged exoplanets in reflected starlight. The importance of knowing the planet radius," Óscar Carrión-González and colleagues investigate the information content in reflected-starlight spectra of exoplanets. They focus on Barnard's Star b, a candidate super-Earth with an assumed radius 0.6 times that of Neptune, an atmosphere dominated by H$_2$-He, and a CH$_4$ volume mixing ratio of 5$\cdot$10$^{-3}$. The authors set up a model of the exoplanet described by seven parameters including its radius, atmospheric methane abundance, and basic properties of a cloud layer. They generate synthetic spectra at zero phase (full disk illumination) from 500 to 900 nm and spectral resolution R$\sim$125-225. They simulate a measured spectrum with a simplified, wavelength-independent noise model at Signal-to-Noise ratio S/N=10. Using an MCMC-based retrieval methodology, they analyze which planet/atmosphere parameters can be inferred from the measured spectrum and the theoretical correlations amongst them. They consider limiting cases in which the planet radius is either known or completely unknown, as well as intermediate cases in which the planet radius is partly constrained. If the planet radius is known, they can generally discriminate between cloud-free and cloudy atmospheres and constrain the methane abundance to within two orders of magnitude. However, if the planet radius is unknown or only partly constrained new correlations between model parameters occur and accuracy of retrievals decreases. Without a radius determination it is challenging to discern whether the planet has clouds and estimates on methane abundance degrade significantly. Nevertheless Carrión-González et al find that even without precise knowledge of an exoplanet's radius they can still constrain it to within a factor of two for all cases explored.
Created on 05 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.