Blasting Operations Using Different Initiation Methods in Deep Underground Mines

AI-generated keywords: Rock Burst Seismic Events Blasting Works Electronic Detonators Delay Times

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper explores the rock burst hazard in underground mining in Polish copper mines.
  • Rock bursts are expected to worsen as mining operations go deeper due to seismic events.
  • Controlled group blasting within potentially unstable roof strata is considered an active method for preventing rock bursts.
  • The authors investigate the effects of different initiation systems on rock burst prevention through seismogram analysis.
  • Electronic detonators allow for precise delay times between explosive detonations, potentially enhancing rock burst prevention measures.
  • The study aims to determine if this approach can be a new blasting method or modify the currently used method for controlling rock bursts in deep mine conditions.
  • Recorded seismic events can be directly attributed to the effects of blasting works.
  • Using electronic detonators enables better control over delay times and could enhance rock burst prevention measures.
  • The analysis of seismograms provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different initiation methods.
  • This research contributes to understanding and mitigating the rock burst hazard in underground mining operations.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Marcin Szumny, Piotr Mertuszka, Krzysztof Fuławka, Eugeniusz Koziarz, David Saiang

arXiv: 2006.02125v1 - DOI (physics.geo-ph)

Abstract: Among different types of hazards associated with underground mining in Polish copper mines, one of the most dangerous is rock burst hazard. Having in mind that the depth of exploitation is getting deeper, this problem will likely get worse in the near future. This kind of hazard is connected inherently with seismic events. Controlled group blasting within a potentially unstable roof stratum is considered as an active method of rock burst prevention. A number of recorded seismic events can be clearly and directly explained by the blasting works effects. With electronic detonators, it is possible to achieve a precise delay time between the detonation of explosives in the individual blastholes and mining faces. Within the framework of this paper, the analysis of seismograms recorded during selected blasting works differing in applied initiation systems, i.e. non-electric and electronic was carried out. It was assumed that this approach may be treated as a new blasting method of rock burst control in deep mines conditions or can be the basis for the modification of the currently used method.

Submitted to arXiv on 03 Jun. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2006.02125v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Blasting Operations Using Different Initiation Methods in Deep Underground Mines" by Marcin Szumny, Piotr Mertuszka, Krzysztof Fuławka, Eugeniusz Koziarz and David Saiang explores the rock burst hazard associated with underground mining in Polish copper mines. As mining operations go deeper, the problem of rock bursts is expected to worsen due to seismic events that pose a significant danger to miners. To prevent rock bursts, controlled group blasting within potentially unstable roof strata is considered an active method. The authors investigate the effects of different initiation systems on rock burst prevention through the analysis of seismograms recorded during blasting works. Specifically, they compare non-electric initiation methods with electronic detonators that allow for precise delay times between explosive detonations in individual blastholes and mining faces. The study aims to determine if this approach can be considered a new blasting method for controlling rock bursts in deep mine conditions or if it can serve as a basis for modifying the currently used method. The findings suggest that recorded seismic events can be directly attributed to the effects of blasting works and that using electronic detonators enables better control over delay times which could potentially enhance rock burst prevention measures. The analysis of seismograms from selected blasting works differing in initiation systems provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of different methods. Overall, this research contributes to understanding and mitigating the rock burst hazard in underground mining operations by exploring alternative initiation methods and their impact on seismic events which could offer potential improvements for preventing rock bursts and ensuring miner safety in deep mines.
Created on 14 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.