Influence of grain growth on the thermal structure of protoplanetary discs

AI-generated keywords: Protoplanetary discs Grain size distribution Thermal structure Migration rates Opacity

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The study investigates the impact of dust grain size distribution on the thermal structure and migration rates in protoplanetary discs.
  • 2D hydrodynamical simulations were performed, taking into account particle size, composition, and abundance.
  • Single grain sizes lead to inaccurate calculations of the thermal structure of discs because the grain size dominating opacity increases with orbital radius.
  • Both multi-grain size distributions give similar results for thermal structure but less steep opacity gradients resulting in less steep aspect ratio gradients compared to discs with only micrometer-sized dust.
  • Discs with a grain size distribution embedded planets experience lower migration rates compared to those with only micrometer-sized dust.
  • Water iceline position depends on alpha-viscosity, initial gas surface density at 1 AU, and dust-to-gas ratio.
  • $r_{ice} \propto \alpha^{0.61} \Sigma_{g,0}^{0.8} f_{DG}^{0.37}$ independently of the distribution used.
  • Including feedback loops between grain growth, opacities and disc thermodynamics allows for more self-consistent simulations when studying accretion disks and planet formation processes.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sofia Savvidou, Bertram Bitsch, Michiel Lambrechts

A&A 640, A63 (2020)
arXiv: 2005.14097v1 - DOI (astro-ph.EP)
Accepted by A&A, 27 pages, 19 figures

Abstract: The thermal structure of a protoplanetary disc is regulated by the opacity that dust grains provide. However, previous works have often considered simplified prescriptions for the dust opacity in hydrodynamical disc simulations, e.g. by considering only a single particle size. In the present work we perform 2D hydrodynamical simulations of protoplanetary discs where the opacity is self-consistently calculated for the dust population, taking into account the particle size, composition and abundance. We first compare simulations using single grain sizes to two different multi-grain size distributions at different levels of turbulence strengths, parameterized through the $\alpha$-viscosity, and different gas surface densities. Assuming a single dust size leads to inaccurate calculations of the thermal structure of discs, because the grain size dominating the opacity increases with orbital radius. Overall the two grain size distributions, one limited by fragmentation only and the other determined from a more complete fragmentation-coagulation equilibrium, give similar results for the thermal structure. We find that both grain size distributions give less steep opacity gradients that result in less steep aspect ratio gradients, in comparison to discs with only micrometer sized dust. Moreover, in the discs with a grain size distribution, the innermost outward migration region is removed and planets embedded is such discs experience lower migration rates. We also investigate the dependency of the water iceline position on the alpha-viscosity, the initial gas surface density at 1 AU and the dust-to-gas ratio and find $r_{ice} \propto \alpha^{0.61} \Sigma_{g,0}^{0.8} f_{DG}^{0.37}$ independently of the distribution used. The inclusion of the feedback loop between grain growth, opacities and disc thermodynamics allows for more self-consistent simulations of accretion discs and planet formation.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 May. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2005.14097v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the study "Influence of grain growth on the thermal structure of protoplanetary discs," Sofia Savvidou, Bertram Bitsch, and Michiel Lambrechts investigate the impact of dust grain size distribution on the thermal structure and migration rates in protoplanetary discs. The authors perform 2D hydrodynamical simulations of protoplanetary discs where they self-consistently calculate the opacity for the dust population, taking into account particle size, composition, and abundance. They compare simulations using single grain sizes to two different multi-grain size distributions at different levels of turbulence strengths parameterized through the $\alpha$-viscosity and different gas surface densities. The authors find that assuming a single dust size leads to inaccurate calculations of the thermal structure of discs because the grain size dominating opacity increases with orbital radius. Overall, both grain size distributions give similar results for thermal structure; however, they find that both distributions give less steep opacity gradients resulting in less steep aspect ratio gradients compared to discs with only micrometer-sized dust. Additionally, in discs with a grain size distribution embedded planets experience lower migration rates compared to those with only micrometer-sized dust. The authors also investigate how water iceline position depends on alpha-viscosity, initial gas surface density at 1 AU, and dust-to-gas ratio. They find $r_{ice} \propto \alpha^{0.61} \Sigma_{g,0}^{0.8} f_{DG}^{0.37}$ independently of the distribution used. Overall, this study highlights how including feedback loops between grain growth, opacities and disc thermodynamics allows for more self-consistent simulations when studying accretion disks and planet formation processes.
Created on 06 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.