## Comprehension and quotient structures in the language of 2-categories

### AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

- The paper "Comprehension and Quotient Structures in the Language of 2-Categories" explores the relationship between comprehension and quotient structures in categorical logic.
- The authors reference Lawvere's work on hyperdoctrines, which showed that the set-theoretic schema of comprehension can be expressed as a comprehension structure on a functor $p:\mathscr{E}\to\mathscr{B}$ defining the hyperdoctrine.
- Melliès and Rolland formulate three levels of comprehension structure on a given functor: (i) comprehension structure, (ii) comprehension structure with section, and (iii) comprehension structure with image.
- Their approach is 2-categorical, meaning they formulate these three levels of comprehension structure on a general morphism $p:\mathrm{\mathbf{E}}\to\mathrm{\mathbf{B}}$ in a 2-category $\mathscr{K}$.
- They show how to lift both types of structures to categories of algebras or coalgebras associated with functors $F_{\mathscr{E}}:\mathscr{E}\to\mathscr{E}$ and $F_{\mathscr{B}}:\mathscr{B}\to\mathscr{B}$.
- Melliès and Rolland argue that this conceptual point of view on comprehension structures enables them to interpret reasoning by induction and coinduction in the traditional language of categorical logic formulated in an appropriate 2-categorical way.
- Overall, their paper provides valuable insights into how different types of categorical structures relate to one another and how these relationships can be leveraged to better understand reasoning in categorical logic.

**Authors:**
Paul-André Melliès,
Nicolas Rolland

**Abstract:** Lawvere observed in his celebrated work on hyperdoctrines that the set-theoretic schema of comprehension can be elegantly expressed in the functorial language of categorical logic, as a comprehension structure on the functor $p:\mathscr{E}\to\mathscr{B}$ defining the hyperdoctrine. In this paper, we formulate and study a strictly ordered hierarchy of three notions of comprehension structure on a given functor $p:\mathscr{E}\to\mathscr{B}$, which we call (i) comprehension structure, (ii) comprehension structure with section, and (iii) comprehension structure with image. Our approach is 2-categorical and we thus formulate the three levels of comprehension structure on a general morphism $p:\mathrm{\mathbf{E}}\to\mathrm{\mathbf{B}}$ in a 2-category $\mathscr{K}$. This conceptual point of view on comprehension structures enables us to revisit the work by Fumex, Ghani and Johann on the duality between comprehension structures and quotient structures on a given functor $p:\mathscr{E}\to\mathscr{B}$. In particular, we show how to lift the comprehension and quotient structures on a functor $p:\mathscr{E}\to\mathscr{B}$ to the categories of algebras or coalgebras associated to functors $F_{\mathscr{E}}:\mathscr{E}\to\mathscr{E}$ and $F_{\mathscr{B}}:\mathscr{B}\to\mathscr{B}$ of interest, in order to interpret reasoning by induction and coinduction in the traditional language of categorical logic, formulated in an appropriate 2-categorical way.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.