Trust Considerations for Explainable Robots: A Human Factors Perspective

Authors: Lindsay Sanneman, Julie A. Shah

Presented at the 2020 Workshop on Assessing, Explaining, and Conveying Robot Proficiency for Human-Robot Teaming

Abstract: Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics have drawn attention to the need for AI systems and robots to be understandable to human users. The explainable AI (XAI) and explainable robots literature aims to enhance human understanding and human-robot team performance by providing users with necessary information about AI and robot behavior. Simultaneously, the human factors literature has long addressed important considerations that contribute to human performance, including human trust in autonomous systems. In this paper, drawing from the human factors literature, we discuss three important trust-related considerations for the design of explainable robot systems: the bases of trust, trust calibration, and trust specificity. We further detail existing and potential metrics for assessing trust in robotic systems based on explanations provided by explainable robots.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 May. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2005.05940v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 28 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

Some bits of the article are not summarized yet, you can re-run the summarizing process by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.