Standardisation of practices in Open Source Hardware

AI-generated keywords: Standardisation Open Source Hardware DIN SPEC 3105 Open Know How Manifest Specification Peer-certification

AI-generated Key Points

  • Standardisation is important for the maturation of any field
  • Standardisation enables recognisable identity and interactions with a wider community
  • Open Source Hardware (OSH) standardisation initiatives have focused on licensing, intellectual property, and documentation formats
  • Recent efforts in OSH standardisation aim to keep projects discoverable and accessible online
  • Two standards currently being released are DIN SPEC 3105 and the Open Know How Manifest Specification
  • DIN SPEC 3105 aims to provide transparency through enforceable content by defining a dedicated assessment procedure for conformity assessment bodies
  • Peer-certification is considered more trustable than self-certification or third-party certification in OSH contexts
  • The Open Know How Manifest Specification focuses on keeping OSH projects findable and accessible online by providing metadata that describes how-to knowledge about hardware development processes
  • Challenges around standardisation in the community include open tool chain, modularity, hardware-specific interface standards, sustainability throughout the life cycle, collaborative future development among others
  • Standardisation initiatives should be developed by communities themselves to ensure relevance and practicality while promoting transparency and trustworthiness
  • Early users and contributors are encouraged to participate in these initiatives to shape their development towards more effective outcomes for all stakeholders involved.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jérémy Bonvoisin, Jenny Molloy, Martin Haeuer, Tobias Wenzel

Journal of Open Hardware, 4(1), p.2 (2020)
9 Pages without abstract and references (else 13), no figures
License: CC BY 4.0

Abstract: Standardisation is an important component in the maturation of any field of technology. It contributes to the formation of a recognisable identity and enables interactions with a wider community. This article reviews past and current standardisation initiatives in the field of Open Source Hardware (OSH). While early initiatives focused on aspects such as licencing, intellectual property and documentation formats, recent efforts extend to ways for users to exercise their rights under open licences and to keep OSH projects discoverable and accessible online. We specifically introduce two standards that are currently being released and call for early users and contributors, the DIN SPEC 3105 and the Open Know How Manifest Specification. Finally, we reflect on challenges around standardisation in the community and relevant areas for future development such as an open tool chain, modularity and hardware specific interface standards.

Submitted to arXiv on 15 Apr. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2004.07143v1

Standardisation is a crucial aspect of the maturation of any field, enabling recognisable identity and interactions with a wider community. In the field of Open Source Hardware (OSH), past and current standardisation initiatives have focused on aspects such as licensing, intellectual property and documentation formats. Recent efforts extend to ways for users to exercise their open permissions and keep OSH projects discoverable and accessible online. Two standards currently being released are the DIN SPEC 3105 and the Open Know How Manifest Specification. The former aims to provide transparency through enforceable content by defining a dedicated assessment procedure for conformity assessment bodies who will play a role akin to that of a scientific journal editor in moderating constructive discussions between authors and reviewers. Peer-certification is considered more trustable than self-certification or third-party certification in OSH contexts where vesting responsibility and decision-making power in the community can increase trust in the credibility and validity of standards. The latter standard focuses on keeping OSH projects findable and accessible online by providing metadata that describes how-to knowledge about hardware development processes. Challenges around standardisation in the community include an open tool chain, modularity, hardware-specific interface standards, sustainability throughout the life cycle, collaborative future development among others. Standardisation initiatives should be developed by communities themselves to ensure relevance and practicality while promoting transparency and trustworthiness. Early users and contributors are encouraged to participate in these initiatives to shape their development towards more effective outcomes for all stakeholders involved.
Created on 19 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.