Modelling death rates due to COVID-19: A Bayesian approach
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Authors conducted a study titled "Modelling death rates due to COVID-19: A Bayesian approach"
- Study aimed to estimate the number of deaths in Peru caused by COVID-19
- Researchers used prior information from daily deaths in China and Peruvian data
- Constructed a predictive Bayesian non-linear model for deaths in Peru
- Objective was to provide estimates to help authorities monitor and manage the pandemic
- Estimated total deaths in Peru around 612 persons, with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 604.3 to 833.7 persons
- Around 99% of expected deaths would be observed approximately 64 days after first reported death
- Inflection point in number of deaths estimated around day 26 after first reported death, with a confidence interval ranging from 25.1 to 26.8 days
- Estimates provide valuable insights for authorities in monitoring and managing the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru
- Findings can inform decision-making processes and help implement effective strategies to mitigate further spread and reduce mortality rates associated with COVID-19
Authors: Cristian Bayes, Victor Sal y Rosas, Luis Valdivieso
Abstract: Objective: To estimate the number of deaths in Peru due to COVID-19. Design: With a priori information obtained from the daily number of deaths due to CODIV-19 in China and data from the Peruvian authorities, we constructed a predictive Bayesian non-linear model for the number of deaths in Peru. Exposure: COVID-19. Outcome: Number of deaths. Results: Assuming an intervention level similar to the one implemented in China, the total number of deaths in Peru is expected to be 612 (95%CI: 604.3 - 833.7) persons. Sixty four days after the first reported death, the 99% of expected deaths will be observed. The inflexion point in the number of deaths is estimated to be around day 26 (95%CI: 25.1 - 26.8) after the first reported death. Conclusion: These estimates can help authorities to monitor the epidemic and implement strategies in order to manage the COVID-19 pandemic.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.