Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study

AI-generated keywords: COVID-19 predictive models clinical data healthcare systems SARS-CoV-2

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Study explores use of predictive algorithms to alleviate strain on healthcare systems caused by COVID-19
  • Authors focus on identifying patients most likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2, require hospitalization, or need intensive care
  • Machine learning techniques and clinical data used to develop clinical predictive models
  • Retrospective evaluation conducted using data from 5,644 patients
  • Predictive models can identify SARS-CoV-2 positive patients with 75% sensitivity and 49% specificity
  • Models can predict hospitalization with AUC value of 0.92 and critical care with AUC value of 0.98
  • Clinical features that are most predictive for each outcome determined
  • Predictive models can help inform care decisions and prioritize resources in managing COVID-19 cases
  • Potential applications in predicting clinical pathways for COVID-19 and improving patient outcomes while reducing strain on healthcare system
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Patrick Schwab, August DuMont Schütte, Benedikt Dietz, Stefan Bauer

Abstract: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a rapidly emerging respiratory disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Due to the rapid human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2, many healthcare systems are at risk of exceeding their healthcare capacities, in particular in terms of SARS-CoV-2 tests, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) beds and mechanical ventilators. Predictive algorithms could potentially ease the strain on healthcare systems by identifying those who are most likely to receive a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, be hospitalised or admitted to the ICU. Here, we study clinical predictive models that estimate, using machine learning and based on routinely collected clinical data, which patients are likely to receive a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, require hospitalisation or intensive care. To evaluate the predictive performance of our models, we perform a retrospective evaluation on clinical and blood analysis data from a cohort of 5644 patients. Our experimental results indicate that our predictive models identify (i) patients that test positive for SARS-CoV-2 a priori at a sensitivity of 75% (95% CI: 67%, 81%) and a specificity of 49% (95% CI: 46%, 51%), (ii) SARS-CoV-2 positive patients that require hospitalisation with 0.92 AUC (95% CI: 0.81, 0.98), and (iii) SARS-CoV-2 positive patients that require critical care with 0.98 AUC (95% CI: 0.95, 1.00). In addition, we determine which clinical features are predictive to what degree for each of the aforementioned clinical tasks. Our results indicate that predictive models trained on routinely collected clinical data could be used to predict clinical pathways for COVID-19, and therefore help inform care and prioritise resources.

Submitted to arXiv on 17 May. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2005.08302v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their study titled "Clinical Predictive Models for COVID-19: Systematic Study," authors Patrick Schwab, August DuMont Schütte, Benedikt Dietz, and Stefan Bauer explore the use of predictive algorithms to alleviate the strain on healthcare systems caused by the rapid transmission of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). The authors focus on identifying patients who are most likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2, require hospitalization, or need intensive care. Using machine learning techniques and routinely collected clinical data, the authors develop clinical predictive models to estimate these outcomes. To evaluate the performance of their models, they conduct a retrospective evaluation using clinical and blood analysis data from a cohort of 5,644 patients. The experimental results indicate that their predictive models can identify patients who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 49%. Additionally, the models can predict which SARS-CoV-2 positive patients will require hospitalization with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.92 and which ones will require critical care with an AUC value of 0.98. Furthermore, the authors determine which clinical features are most predictive for each of these outcomes. This information can help inform care decisions and prioritize resources in managing COVID-19 cases. Overall, this study demonstrates that predictive models trained on routinely collected clinical data have potential applications in predicting clinical pathways for COVID-19. By identifying high risk individuals early on, healthcare systems can better allocate resources and provide timely interventions to those who need them most; thus improving patient outcomes while reducing strain on medical personnel and facilities during times of crisis such as pandemics like COVID 19.
Created on 23 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.