## An approximate KLD based experimental design for models with intractable likelihoods

### AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

- The paper addresses the importance of data collection in statistical inference and data science
- Statistical experimental design aims to determine the optimal setup for data collection
- Likelihoods of some setups are not available in a closed form
- The Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) based design criterion cannot be directly applied in such cases
- Authors propose a new utility function as a lower bound for the original KLD utility
- This lower bound is expressed as a summation of entropies in the data space
- Efficient evaluation using entropy estimation methods is possible with this approach
- The proposed method allows optimization of experimental designs even when likelihood functions are not readily available
- Numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method
- The paper contributes to advancing statistical inference and data science methodologies by enabling optimization of experimental designs without closed form likelihood functions.

**Authors:**
Ziqiao Ao,
Jinglai Li

**Abstract:** Data collection is a critical step in statistical inference and data science, and the goal of statistical experimental design (ED) is to find the data collection setup that can provide most information for the inference. In this work we consider a special type of ED problems where the likelihoods are not available in a closed form. In this case, the popular information-theoretic Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) based design criterion can not be used directly, as it requires to evaluate the likelihood function. To address the issue, we derive a new utility function, which is a lower bound of the original KLD utility. This lower bound is expressed in terms of the summation of two or more entropies in the data space, and thus can be evaluated efficiently via entropy estimation methods. We provide several numerical examples to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.