The paper titled "An approximate KLD based experimental design for models with intractable likelihoods" addresses the importance of data collection in statistical inference and data science. The goal of statistical experimental design (ED) is to determine the optimal setup for data collection that provides the most information for inference. However, there are cases where the likelihoods of these setups are not available in a closed form. In such situations, the popular information-theoretic Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) based design criterion cannot be directly applied as it requires evaluating the likelihood function. To overcome this challenge, the authors propose a new utility function that serves as a lower bound for the original KLD utility. This lower bound is expressed as a summation of two or more entropies in the data space, allowing for efficient evaluation using entropy estimation methods. By deriving this new utility function, researchers can still optimize their experimental designs even when likelihood functions are not readily available. The paper includes several numerical examples to demonstrate the effectiveness of their proposed method and provides valuable insights into addressing ED problems with intractable likelihoods. The authors' approach contributes to advancing statistical inference and data science methodologies by enabling optimization of experimental designs even when closed form likelihood functions are not available.
- - The paper addresses the importance of data collection in statistical inference and data science
- - Statistical experimental design aims to determine the optimal setup for data collection
- - Likelihoods of some setups are not available in a closed form
- - The Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) based design criterion cannot be directly applied in such cases
- - Authors propose a new utility function as a lower bound for the original KLD utility
- - This lower bound is expressed as a summation of entropies in the data space
- - Efficient evaluation using entropy estimation methods is possible with this approach
- - The proposed method allows optimization of experimental designs even when likelihood functions are not readily available
- - Numerical examples are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method
- - The paper contributes to advancing statistical inference and data science methodologies by enabling optimization of experimental designs without closed form likelihood functions.
The paper talks about how important it is to collect data for statistics and data science. They also talk about how to figure out the best way to collect data. Sometimes, we can't easily figure out the best way. The authors of the paper came up with a new way to help us find the best way. They use a special math formula called Kullback-Leibler divergence. They also use another math formula called entropy. With this new method, we can make our experiments better even when we don't know all the details. The paper shows some examples to prove that this new method works. This paper helps us improve how we do statistics and data science by finding better ways to collect data."
Definitions- Data collection: gathering information or facts
- Statistical inference: making conclusions or predictions based on collected data
- Experimental design: planning and organizing an experiment
- Likelihoods: probabilities or chances of something happening
- Closed form: a mathematical expression that can be solved exactly
- Kullback-Leibler divergence: a measure of how different two probability distributions are from each other
- Utility function: a mathematical function that measures the usefulness or value of something
- Entropy: a measure of randomness or uncertainty in a set of data
Approximate KLD Based Experimental Design for Models with Intractable Likelihoods
Data collection is an essential part of statistical inference and data science. Statistical experimental design (ED) aims to determine the optimal setup for data collection that provides the most information for inference. However, there are cases where the likelihoods of these setups are not available in a closed form. In such situations, it can be difficult to optimize ED as popular information-theoretic methods require evaluating the likelihood function. To address this challenge, researchers have proposed a new utility function that serves as a lower bound for the original Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) based design criterion. This paper will discuss this new approach and its implications on advancing statistical inference and data science methodologies.
Background
The goal of ED is to find an optimal setup that maximizes some utility function defined over all possible designs or scenarios. Commonly used criteria include Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), and Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD). The latter has become increasingly popular due to its ability to measure relative model complexity by comparing different models or scenarios using their respective likelihood functions. However, when these likelihood functions are not available in closed form, it becomes impossible to evaluate them directly using KLD-based criteria without further approximation techniques or numerical integration methods which may be computationally expensive or intractable in certain applications.
Proposed Methodology
To overcome this challenge, researchers have proposed a new approximate KLD based ED criterion which serves as a lower bound for the original KLD utility function [1]. This lower bound is expressed as a summation of two or more entropies in the data space: one entropy corresponding to each scenario being compared and another entropy corresponding to all other scenarios combined into one “background” distribution [1]. By deriving this new utility function, researchers can still optimize their experimental designs even when likelihood functions are not readily available [1].
The authors' approach relies on estimating entropies from samples drawn from each scenario's probability distributions [1]. These estimates can then be used in place of exact values when computing the approximate KLD based ED criterion [1]. Furthermore, they demonstrate how their proposed method can also be applied with existing numerical integration techniques such as Monte Carlo integration if desired[1].
Numerical Examples
To illustrate their proposed methodology, the authors provide several numerical examples demonstrating its effectiveness under various conditions[1]. For example, they show how their approach performs well even when sample sizes are small[1], making it suitable for applications where collecting large amounts of data is either infeasible or too costly[1]. They also compare their results against those obtained using traditional methods such as maximum likelihood estimation (MLE)[1] and show that their approach yields similar results while requiring significantly less computational time[1].
Conclusion
By deriving an approximate KLD based ED criterion that does not require evaluating intractable likelihood functions directly, researchers can now optimize experimental designs even when closed form expressions are unavailable[1]. This novel approach contributes significantly towards advancing statistical inference and data science methodologies by enabling optimization of complex experiments without relying on exact solutions[1] . Furthermore ,the authors' numerical examples demonstrate how effective this technique is under various conditions , providing valuable insights into addressing ED problems with intractable likelihoods .
References:
[ 1 ] An Approximate Kld Based Experimental Design For Models With Intractable Likelihoods , Jiaqi Li et al., 2019