Comprehensive Framework of RDMA-enabled Concurrency Control Protocols

Authors: Chao Wang, Kezhao Huang, Xuehai Qian

Abstract: In this paper, we develop RCC, the first unified and comprehensive RDMA-enabled distributed transaction processing framework supporting six serializable concurrency control protocols: not only the classical protocols NOWAIT, WAITDIE, and OCC, but also more advanced MVCC and SUNDIAL, and even CALVIN, the deterministic concurrency control protocol. Our goal is to unbiasedly compare the protocols in a common execution environment with the concurrency control protocol being the only changeable component. We focus on the correct and efficient implementation using key techniques, such as co-routines, outstanding requests, and doorbell batching, with two-sided and one-sided communication primitives. Based on RCC, we get the deep insights that cannot be obtained by any existing systems. Most importantly, we obtain the execution stage latency breakdowns with one-sided and two-sided primitive for each protocol, which are analyzed to develop more efficient hybrid implementations. Our results show that three hybrid designs are indeed better than both one-sided and two-sided implementations by up to 17.8%. We believe that RCC is a significant advance over the state-of-the-art; it can both provide performance insights and be used as the common infrastructure for fast prototyping new implementations.

Submitted to arXiv on 28 Feb. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2002.12664v4

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 18 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.