Free-ranging dogs do not distinguish between barks without context

AI-generated keywords: Canids Social Organization Vocalizations Playback Experiment Long-term Observations

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Canids exhibit a wide range of social organizations from solitary-living to pack-living
  • Free-ranging dogs have evolved from pack-living gray wolf-like ancestors but are now facultatively social and prefer to forage alone
  • Vocal communication plays a critical role in maintaining the social dynamics of free-ranging dogs, with barking being the most common type of vocalization
  • Dogs have a broad hearing range and can respond to sounds over long distances
  • Previous studies have shown that domestic dogs can distinguish between barking in different contexts
  • Researchers conducted a playback experiment to test if free-ranging dogs could differentiate between barking from their own group members versus non-group members without context
  • The results showed that while dogs responded differently to barking from other groups during territorial exchanges, they did not respond differently to self and other group barking in the playback experiments
  • Context plays an essential role in dog interactions
  • Future studies should compare responses in playback experiments with natural behavior observed through long-term observations.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Prothama Manna, Anindita Bhadra

arXiv: 2001.06415v1 - DOI (q-bio.QM)
6 figure, 2 tables

Abstract: Canids display a vast diversity of social organizations, from solitary-living to pairs to packs. Domestic dogs have descended from pack-living gray wolf-like ancestors. Unlike their group living ancestors, free-ranging dogs are facultatively social, preferring to forage solitarily. They are scavengers by nature, mostly dependent on human garbage and generosity for their sustenance. Free-ranging dogs are highly territorial, often defending their territories using vocalizations. Vocal communication plays a critical role between inter and intraspecies and group interaction and maintaining their social dynamics. Barking is the most common among the different types of vocalizations of dogs. Dogs have a broad hearing range and can respond to sounds over long distances. Domestic dogs have been shown to have the ability to distinguish between barking in different contexts. Since free-ranging dogs regularly engage in various kinds of interactions with each other, it is interesting to know whether they are capable of distinguishing between vocalizations of their own and other groups. In this study, a playback experiment was used to test if dogs can distinguish between barking of their own group member from a non-group member. Though dogs respond to barking from other groups in territorial exchanges, they did not respond differently to the self and other group barking in the playback experiments. This suggests a role of context in the interactions between dogs and opens up possibilities for future studies on the comparison of the responses of dogs in playback experiments with their natural behavior through long-term observations.

Submitted to arXiv on 01 Jan. 2020

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 2001.06415v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Canids, including domestic dogs, exhibit a wide range of social organizations from solitary-living to pack-living. Free-ranging dogs have evolved from pack-living gray wolf-like ancestors but are now facultatively social and prefer to forage alone. They rely on human garbage and generosity for their sustenance and are highly territorial, using vocalizations to defend their territories. Vocal communication plays a critical role in maintaining the social dynamics of free-ranging dogs, with barking being the most common type of vocalization. Dogs have a broad hearing range and can respond to sounds over long distances. Previous studies have shown that domestic dogs can distinguish between barking in different contexts. To further investigate this phenomenon, researchers conducted a playback experiment to test if free-ranging dogs could differentiate between barking from their own group members versus non-group members without context. The results showed that while dogs responded differently to barking from other groups during territorial exchanges, they did not respond differently to self and other group barking in the playback experiments. This suggests that context plays an essential role in dog interactions and highlights the need for future studies comparing responses in playback experiments with natural behavior observed through long-term observations. Overall, this study provides insights into the complex social dynamics of free-ranging dogs and how they communicate with each other through vocalizations. It also demonstrates the importance of considering context when studying canine communication behaviors as well as the need for further research on long-term observations of these animals' interactions with one another.
Created on 11 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.