A Benchmark for Lidar Sensors in Fog: Is Detection Breaking Down?
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Achieving level five autonomy in autonomous driving requires more than just self-driving capabilities under ideal weather conditions.
- Adverse weather such as fog, rain, and snow degrade the perception of the environment for autonomous vehicles.
- A study was conducted to evaluate the performance of current lidar sensors in foggy conditions.
- Four different lidar systems were tested in a controlled environment within a fog chamber.
- The researchers aimed to identify problems and disturbance patterns associated with these lidar systems in adverse weather conditions.
- Tuning internal parameters could potentially enhance the performance of these sensors in bad weather situations.
- Understanding limitations and disturbances when using lidar sensors in adverse weather helps develop more robust algorithms for accurate perception.
- Evaluating lidar sensor performance in adverse weather scenarios is important for achieving higher levels of safety and reliability.
Authors: Mario Bijelic, Tobias Gruber, Werner Ritter
Abstract: Autonomous driving at level five does not only means self-driving in the sunshine. Adverse weather is especially critical because fog, rain, and snow degrade the perception of the environment. In this work, current state of the art light detection and ranging (lidar) sensors are tested in controlled conditions in a fog chamber. We present current problems and disturbance patterns for four different state of the art lidar systems. Moreover, we investigate how tuning internal parameters can improve their performance in bad weather situations. This is of great importance because most state of the art detection algorithms are based on undisturbed lidar data.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.