Contextualization of Big Data Quality: A framework for comparison

Authors: Mostafa Mirzaie, Behshid Behkamal, Samad Paydar

18 pages, submitted to journal of data and information quality

Abstract: With the advent of big data applications and the increasing amount of data being produced in these applications, the importance of efficient methods for big data analysis has become highly evident. However, the success of any such method will be hindered should the data lacks the required quality. Big data quality assessment is therefore a major requirement for any organization or business that use big data analytics for its decision making. On the other hand, using contextual information is advantageous in many analysis tasks in various domains, e.g. user behavior analysis in the social networks. However, the big data quality assessment has benefited less from this potential. There is a vast variety of data sources in the big data domain that can be utilized to improve the quality evaluation of big data. Including contextual information provided by these sources into the big data quality assessment process is an emerging trend towards more advanced techniques aimed at enhancing the performance and accuracy of quality assessment. This paper presents a context classification framework for big data quality, categorizing the context features into four primary dimensions: 1) context category, 2) data source type that contextual features come from, 3) discovery and extraction method of context, and 4) the quality factors affected by the contextual data. The proposed model introduces new context features and dimensions that need to be taken into consideration in quality assessment of big data. The initial evaluation demonstrates that the model is more understandable, more comprehensive, richer, and more useful compared to existing models.

Submitted to arXiv on 26 Oct. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1911.01274v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 18 Aug. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.