Leadership scenarios in prisoner's dilemma game
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper explores the implications of the prisoner's dilemma game for transactional and transformative leadership.
- The authors discuss a Pareto-optimal scenario where the leader commits to react probabilistically to pure strategies of the follower, who is free to make the first move.
- By offering F an opportunity to resolve the dilemma, L can get a larger average payoff than under an autocratic leadership model that is inefficient for this game.
- This exploitation can be stabilized via repeated interaction between L and F and turns out to be more stable than an egalitarian regime where both parties receive equal payoffs.
- Total payoff of exploiting regime is never larger than in egalitarian case.
- The authors also discuss applications of this solution to fighting corruption through soft methods and modeling Machiavellian leadership when defection benefit is large.
- Optimal strategies of F are mixed while summary payoff is maximal - one mechanism for sustaining this solution being that L recognizes intentions of F.
- Overall, this study provides new insights into how leaders can navigate situations involving cooperation and competition with followers in order to achieve better outcomes for all parties involved.
Authors: S. G. Babajanyan, A. V. Melkikh, A. E. Allahverdyan
Abstract: The prisoner's dilemma game is the most known contribution of game theory into social sciences. Here we describe new implications of this game for transactional and transformative leadership. While the autocratic (Stackelberg's) leadership is inefficient for this game, we discuss a Pareto-optimal scenario, where the leader L commits to react probabilistically to pure strategies of the follower F, which is free to make the first move. Offering F to resolve the dilemma, L is able to get a larger average pay-off. The exploitation can be stabilized via repeated interaction of L and F, and turns to be more stable than the egalitarian regime, where the pay-offs of L and F are equal. The total (summary) pay-off of the exploiting regime is never larger than in the egalitarian case. We discuss applications of this solution to a soft method of fighting corruption and to modeling the Machiavellian leadership. Whenever the defection benefit is large, the optimal strategies of F are mixed, while the summary pay-off is maximal. One mechanism for sustaining this solution is that L recognizes intentions of F.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.