Kidney Recognition in CT Using YOLOv3
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper evaluates the performance of the object detection model, YOLOv3, for kidney localization in both 2D and 3D from CT scans.
- YOLOv3 achieved a Dice score of 0.851 in 2D and 0.742 in 3D for kidney localization, indicating high accuracy.
- Another object detection model called SSD also demonstrated comparable scores on the test set.
- Both YOLOv3 and SSD can detect kidneys across a wide range of CT scans, including those from patients with various renal conditions.
- These models have potential applications in clinical settings where accurate kidney localization is crucial for diagnosis and treatment planning.
- The research provides valuable insights into the performance of YOLOv3 and SSD for kidney recognition in CT scans.
- The high accuracy achieved by these models highlights their potential as effective tools for organ localization tasks in medical imaging, contributing to improved patient care and diagnosis accuracy.
Authors: Andréanne Lemay
Abstract: Organ localization can be challenging considering the heterogeneity of medical images and the biological diversity from one individual to another. The contribution of this paper is to overview the performance of the object detection model, YOLOv3, on kidney localization in 2D and in 3D from CT scans. The model obtained a 0.851 Dice score in 2D and 0.742 in 3D. The SSD, a similar state-of-the-art object detection model, showed similar scores on the test set. YOLOv3 and SSD demonstrated the ability to detect kidneys on a wide variety of CT scans including patients suffering from different renal conditions.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.