## Deep learning dark matter map reconstructions from DES SV weak lensing data

### AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

- First reconstruction of dark matter maps from weak lensing observational data using deep learning
- Trained a convolution neural network (CNN) with a Unet based architecture on over $3.6\times10^5$ simulated data realisations
- Interpret their newly created DES SV map as an approximation of the posterior mean $P(\kappa | \gamma)$ of the convergence given observed shear
- DeepMass method is substantially more accurate than existing mass-mapping methods
- Validation set of 8000 simulated DES SV data realisations showed that DeepMass improved the mean-square-error (MSE) by 11 per cent compared to Wiener filtering with a fixed power spectrum
- N-body simulated MICE mock data also showed that Wiener filtering with the optimal known power spectrum still gives a worse MSE than their generalised method with no input cosmological parameters; improvement driven by non-linear structures in the convergence
- With higher galaxy density in future weak lensing data, deep learning likely to be leading approach for mass mapping with Euclid and LSST
- Study provides evidence that deep learning outperforms traditional mass-mapping methods in terms of accuracy and efficiency

**Authors:**
Niall Jeffrey,
François Lanusse,
Ofer Lahav,
Jean-Luc Starck

**Abstract:** We present the first reconstruction of dark matter maps from weak lensing observational data using deep learning. We train a convolution neural network (CNN) with a Unet based architecture on over $3.6\times10^5$ simulated data realisations with non-Gaussian shape noise and with cosmological parameters varying over a broad prior distribution. We interpret our newly created DES SV map as an approximation of the posterior mean $P(\kappa | \gamma)$ of the convergence given observed shear. Our DeepMass method is substantially more accurate than existing mass-mapping methods. With a validation set of 8000 simulated DES SV data realisations, compared to Wiener filtering with a fixed power spectrum, the DeepMass method improved the mean-square-error (MSE) by 11 per cent. With N-body simulated MICE mock data, we show that Wiener filtering with the optimal known power spectrum still gives a worse MSE than our generalised method with no input cosmological parameters; we show that the improvement is driven by the non-linear structures in the convergence. With higher galaxy density in future weak lensing data unveiling more non-linear scales, it is likely that deep learning will be a leading approach for mass mapping with Euclid and LSST.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.