Adaptive Pricing in Insurance: Generalized Linear Models and Gaussian Process Regression Approaches
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper explores the application of dynamic pricing to insurance as an online revenue management problem.
- Two pricing models are developed: an adaptive Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and an adaptive Gaussian Process (GP) regression model.
- Both models balance exploration and exploitation to optimize long-term revenue from selling a new insurance product.
- Performance is measured in terms of regret, which refers to expected revenue loss caused by not using the optimal price.
- Maximum quasi-likelihood estimation (MQLE) is used to estimate unknown parameters in their adaptive GLM design.
- The authors show that if prices are chosen with suitably decreasing variability, MQLE parameters eventually exist and converge to correct values, implying that the sequence of chosen prices will also converge to optimal price.
- In their adaptive GP regression model, demand and claims are sampled from Gaussian Processes before selling prices are determined by upper confidence bound rule.
- The study represents one of the first works to consider dynamic pricing problems specifically within insurance and exploring Gaussian Process regression within insurance pricing.
- Overall, these initial findings suggest that online machine learning algorithms could be a fruitful area for future investigation and application within insurance.
Authors: Yuqing Zhang, Neil Walton
Abstract: We study the application of dynamic pricing to insurance. We view this as an online revenue management problem where the insurance company looks to set prices to optimize the long-run revenue from selling a new insurance product. We develop two pricing models: an adaptive Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and an adaptive Gaussian Process (GP) regression model. Both balance between exploration, where we choose prices in order to learn the distribution of demands & claims for the insurance product, and exploitation, where we myopically choose the best price from the information gathered so far. The performance of the pricing policies is measured in terms of regret: the expected revenue loss caused by not using the optimal price. As is commonplace in insurance, we model demand and claims by GLMs. In our adaptive GLM design, we use the maximum quasi-likelihood estimation (MQLE) to estimate the unknown parameters. We show that, if prices are chosen with suitably decreasing variability, the MQLE parameters eventually exist and converge to the correct values, which in turn implies that the sequence of chosen prices will also converge to the optimal price. In the adaptive GP regression model, we sample demand and claims from Gaussian Processes and then choose selling prices by the upper confidence bound rule. We also analyze these GLM and GP pricing algorithms with delayed claims. Although similar results exist in other domains, this is among the first works to consider dynamic pricing problems in the field of insurance. We also believe this is the first work to consider Gaussian Process regression in the context of insurance pricing. These initial findings suggest that online machine learning algorithms could be a fruitful area of future investigation and application in insurance.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.