Adaptive Pricing in Insurance: Generalized Linear Models and Gaussian Process Regression Approaches

AI-generated keywords: Dynamic Pricing Insurance Generalized Linear Model Gaussian Process Regression Revenue Management

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper explores the application of dynamic pricing to insurance as an online revenue management problem.
  • Two pricing models are developed: an adaptive Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and an adaptive Gaussian Process (GP) regression model.
  • Both models balance exploration and exploitation to optimize long-term revenue from selling a new insurance product.
  • Performance is measured in terms of regret, which refers to expected revenue loss caused by not using the optimal price.
  • Maximum quasi-likelihood estimation (MQLE) is used to estimate unknown parameters in their adaptive GLM design.
  • The authors show that if prices are chosen with suitably decreasing variability, MQLE parameters eventually exist and converge to correct values, implying that the sequence of chosen prices will also converge to optimal price.
  • In their adaptive GP regression model, demand and claims are sampled from Gaussian Processes before selling prices are determined by upper confidence bound rule.
  • The study represents one of the first works to consider dynamic pricing problems specifically within insurance and exploring Gaussian Process regression within insurance pricing.
  • Overall, these initial findings suggest that online machine learning algorithms could be a fruitful area for future investigation and application within insurance.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Yuqing Zhang, Neil Walton

33 pages, 3 figures

Abstract: We study the application of dynamic pricing to insurance. We view this as an online revenue management problem where the insurance company looks to set prices to optimize the long-run revenue from selling a new insurance product. We develop two pricing models: an adaptive Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and an adaptive Gaussian Process (GP) regression model. Both balance between exploration, where we choose prices in order to learn the distribution of demands & claims for the insurance product, and exploitation, where we myopically choose the best price from the information gathered so far. The performance of the pricing policies is measured in terms of regret: the expected revenue loss caused by not using the optimal price. As is commonplace in insurance, we model demand and claims by GLMs. In our adaptive GLM design, we use the maximum quasi-likelihood estimation (MQLE) to estimate the unknown parameters. We show that, if prices are chosen with suitably decreasing variability, the MQLE parameters eventually exist and converge to the correct values, which in turn implies that the sequence of chosen prices will also converge to the optimal price. In the adaptive GP regression model, we sample demand and claims from Gaussian Processes and then choose selling prices by the upper confidence bound rule. We also analyze these GLM and GP pricing algorithms with delayed claims. Although similar results exist in other domains, this is among the first works to consider dynamic pricing problems in the field of insurance. We also believe this is the first work to consider Gaussian Process regression in the context of insurance pricing. These initial findings suggest that online machine learning algorithms could be a fruitful area of future investigation and application in insurance.

Submitted to arXiv on 02 Jul. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1907.05381v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper "Adaptive Pricing in Insurance: Generalized Linear Models and Gaussian Process Regression Approaches," authors Yuqing Zhang and Neil Walton explore the application of dynamic pricing to insurance. They approach this as an online revenue management problem where the goal is to set prices that optimize long-term revenue from selling a new insurance product. The authors develop two pricing models: an adaptive Generalized Linear Model (GLM) and an adaptive Gaussian Process (GP) regression model. Both models balance exploration, where prices are chosen to learn the distribution of demands and claims for the insurance product, with exploitation, where the best price is chosen based on information gathered so far. The performance of these pricing policies is measured in terms of regret, which refers to expected revenue loss caused by not using the optimal price. As demand and claims are commonly modeled by GLMs in insurance, the authors use maximum quasi-likelihood estimation (MQLE) to estimate unknown parameters in their adaptive GLM design. They show that if prices are chosen with suitably decreasing variability, MQLE parameters eventually exist and converge to correct values, implying that the sequence of chosen prices will also converge to optimal price. In their adaptive GP regression model, demand and claims are sampled from Gaussian Processes before selling prices are determined by upper confidence bound rule. The authors also analyze these GLM and GP pricing algorithms with delayed claims. While similar results exist in other domains, this study represents one of the first works to consider dynamic pricing problems specifically within insurance. Additionally, it is believed to be among the first studies exploring Gaussian Process regression within insurance pricing. Overall, these initial findings suggest that online machine learning algorithms could be a fruitful area for future investigation and application within insurance.
Created on 18 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.