Automated Machine Learning with Monte-Carlo Tree Search (Extended Version)
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Automated Machine Learning (AutoML) involves selecting the most suitable algorithm and determining hyperparameter values for optimal performance on a dataset.
- Mosaic is a Monte-Carlo tree search (MCTS) based approach designed to address complex AutoML problems by combining structural and parametric optimization in an expensive black-box setting.
- The study includes empirical investigations comparing optimization processes based on Bayesian optimization versus MCTS, exploring warm-start initialization techniques, and assessing the benefits of ensembling solutions gathered during the search process.
- Mosaic outperformed Auto-Sklearn in tests on both OpenML 100 benchmark dataset and Scikit-learn portfolio, showing statistically significant improvements in AutoML tasks by leveraging innovative MCTS-based strategies.
Authors: Herilalaina Rakotoarison, Marc Schoenauer, Michèle Sebag
Abstract: The AutoML task consists of selecting the proper algorithm in a machine learning portfolio, and its hyperparameter values, in order to deliver the best performance on the dataset at hand. Mosaic, a Monte-Carlo tree search (MCTS) based approach, is presented to handle the AutoML hybrid structural and parametric expensive black-box optimization problem. Extensive empirical studies are conducted to independently assess and compare: i) the optimization processes based on Bayesian optimization or MCTS; ii) its warm-start initialization; iii) the ensembling of the solutions gathered along the search. Mosaic is assessed on the OpenML 100 benchmark and the Scikit-learn portfolio, with statistically significant gains over Auto-Sklearn, winner of former international AutoML challenges.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.