Resilience Dynamics of Urban Water Security and Potential for Tipping Points

AI-generated keywords: Urban water supply Resilience Capitals Dynamics Model Community Adaptation

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Cities are important for economic and social progress but face challenges in providing essential services like water supply
  • Urban water supply security is defined by citizen's access to these services
  • Resilience of these services depends on critical system elements or 'capitals' including water resources, infrastructure, finances, management efficacy, and community adaptation
  • The authors used quantitative information from seven cities on four continents to create a systems dynamics model that simulates the impact and recovery cycles when water services are disrupted by stochastic shocks
  • Systematic assessment of the parameter space produces an urban water resilience landscape allowing them to determine the position of each city along a continuous gradient from non-resilient to resilient systems
  • Water-insecure and non-resilient cities risk being pushed into a poverty trap while cities with excess capitals risk being trapped in rigidity and crossing a tipping point from high to low services and collapse
  • Community adaptation improves water security and resilience to varying degrees when public services are insufficient
  • The study highlights the need for resilience thinking in governing urban water systems under global change pressures.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Elisabeth H. Krueger, Dietrich Borchardt, James W. Jawitz, Harald Klammler, Soohyun Yang, Jonatan Zischg, P. Suresh C. Rao

arXiv: 1904.07863v2 - DOI (physics.soc-ph)
32 pages + Supplementary Material, 4 figures, article under review

Abstract: Cities are the drivers of socio-economic innovation, and are also forced to address the accelerating risk of failure in providing essential services such as water supply today and in the future. Here, we investigate the resilience of urban water supply security, which is defined in terms of the services that citizens receive. The resilience of services is determined by the availability and robustness of critical system elements, or 'capitals' (water resources, infrastructure, finances, management efficacy and community adaptation). We translate quantitative information about this portfolio of capitals from seven contrasting cities on four continents into parameters of a coupled systems dynamics model. Water services are disrupted by recurring stochastic shocks, and we simulate the dynamics of impact and recovery cycles. Resilience emerges under various constraints, expressed in terms of each city's capital portfolio. Systematic assessment of the parameter space produces the urban water resilience landscape, and we determine the position of each city along a continuous gradient from water insecure and non-resilient to secure and resilient systems. In several cities stochastic disturbance regimes challenge steady-state conditions and drive system collapse. While water insecure and non-resilient cities risk being pushed into a poverty trap, cities which have developed excess capitals risk being trapped in rigidity and crossing a tipping point from high to low services and collapse. Where public services are insufficient, community adaptation improves water security and resilience to varying degrees. Our results highlight the need for resilience thinking in the governance of urban water systems under global change pressures.

Submitted to arXiv on 16 Apr. 2019

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1904.07863v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

Cities are the engines of economic and social progress but also face significant challenges in providing essential services such as water supply. This study investigates the resilience of urban water supply security which is defined in terms of the services that citizens receive. The resilience of these services depends on the availability and robustness of critical system elements or 'capitals' including water resources, infrastructure, finances, management efficacy and community adaptation. The authors translate quantitative information about these capitals from seven contrasting cities on four continents into parameters of a coupled systems dynamics model. They simulate the dynamics of impact and recovery cycles when water services are disrupted by recurring stochastic shocks. Resilience emerges under various constraints expressed in terms of each city's capital portfolio. Systematic assessment of the parameter space produces an urban water resilience landscape allowing them to determine the position of each city along a continuous gradient from water insecure and non-resilient to secure and resilient systems. The results show that several cities face stochastic disturbance regimes that challenge steady-state conditions and drive system collapse. While water-insecure and non-resilient cities risk being pushed into a poverty trap, cities with excess capitals risk being trapped in rigidity and crossing a tipping point from high to low services and collapse. Where public services are insufficient, community adaptation improves water security and resilience to varying degrees. The findings highlight the need for resilience thinking in governing urban water systems under global change pressures. Overall this study provides valuable insights into how different capitals contribute to urban water security resilience across diverse contexts worldwide.
Created on 10 Jun. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.