Hot exozodiacal dust: an exocometary origin?
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The study investigates two mechanisms for the production of exozodiacal dust: Poynting-Robertson drag pile-up scenario and exocometary dust delivery scenario.
- A new numerical model was developed to calculate dust dynamics, including non-orbit-averaged equations for grains close to the star, dust sublimation, and a radiative transfer code for direct comparison with observations.
- Four stellar types and three dust compositions were considered, assuming a parent belt at 50 au.
- The Poynting-Robertson drag pile-up scenario cannot produce long-lived submicron-sized grains close to the star. Inward drifting grains fill in the region between the parent belt and sublimation distance, producing an unrealistically strong mid-infrared excess compared to near-infrared excess.
- Exocometary dust delivery scenario can form a narrow ring close to the sublimation zone populated with large grains several tens to several hundred micrometers in radius. This scenario provides a better match with observations if carbon-rich grains are present.
- The required number of active exocomets needed to sustain observed dust level is reasonable.
- Hot exozodiacal dust detected by near-infrared interferometry is unlikely due to inward grain migration by Poynting-Robertson drag from distant parent belt but could instead have an exocometary origin.
Authors: Élie Sezestre, Jean-Charles Augereau, Philippe Thébault
Abstract: We aim to explore two exozodiacal dust production mechanisms, first re-investigating the Poynting-Robertson drag pile-up scenario, and then elaborating on the less explored, but promising exocometary dust delivery scenario. We developped a new versatile, numerical model that calculates the dust dynamics, with non orbit-averaged equations for the grains close to the star. The model includes dust sublimation and incorporates a radiative transfer code for direct comparison to the observations. We consider in this study four stellar types, three dust compositions, and we assume a parent belt at 50 au. We find that, in the case of the Poynting-Robertson drag pile-up scenario, it is impossible to produce long-lived submicron-sized grains close to the star. The inward drifting grains fill in the region between the parent belt and the sublimation distance, producing an unrealistically strong mid-infrared excess compared to the near-infrared excess. The dust pile-up at the sublimation radius is by far insufficient to boost the near-IR flux of the exozodi to the point where it dominates over the mid-infrared excess. In the case of the exocometary dust delivery scenario, we find that a narrow ring can form close to the sublimation zone, populated with large grains several tens to several hundred of micrometers in radius. Although not perfect, this scenario provides a better match to the observations, especially if the grains are carbon-rich. We also find that the required number of active exocomets to sustain the observed dust level is reasonable. We conclude that the hot exozodiacal dust detected by near-infrared interferometry is unlikely to result from inwards grains migration by Poynting-Robertson drag from a distant parent belt, but could instead have an exocometary origin. [Abridged]
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.