## Learning the dynamics of technical trading strategies

### AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

- The paper "Learning the Dynamics of Technical Trading Strategies" explores the interplay between different technical trading strategies from a data-informed perspective.
- The authors use an adversarial expert based online learning algorithm to learn the optimal parameters required to maximize wealth trading zero-cost portfolio strategies.
- The algorithm is used to determine the relative population dynamics of technical trading strategies that can survive historical back-testing, as well as form an overall aggregated portfolio trading strategy from the set of underlying trading strategies implemented on daily and intraday Johannesburg Stock Exchange data.
- The resulting population time-series are investigated using unsupervised learning for dimensionality reduction and visualization.
- The overall aggregated trading strategies are tested for statistical arbitrage using a novel hypothesis test proposed by Jarrow et al. (2012) on both daily sampled and intraday time-scales.
- Low frequency daily sampled strategies fail the arbitrage tests after costs, while high frequency intraday sampled strategies are not falsified as statistical arbitrages after costs.
- Estimates of trading strategy success, cost of trading, and slippage are considered along with an online benchmark portfolio algorithm for performance comparison.
- The algorithms generalization error is analyzed by recovering a probability of back-test overfitting estimate using a nonparametric procedure introduced by Bailey et al. (2016).
- This work aims to better understand how different technical trading strategies interact with each other in order to inform future investment decisions.
- By utilizing advanced machine learning techniques and testing for statistical arbitrage, Murphy and Gebbie provide valuable insights into how these complex systems operate in real-world scenarios.

**Authors:**
Nicholas Murphy,
Tim Gebbie

**Abstract:** We use an adversarial expert based online learning algorithm to learn the optimal parameters required to maximise wealth trading zero-cost portfolio strategies. The learning algorithm is used to determine the relative population dynamics of technical trading strategies that can survive historical back-testing as well as form an overall aggregated portfolio trading strategy from the set of underlying trading strategies implemented on daily and intraday Johannesburg Stock Exchange data. The resulting population time-series are investigated using unsupervised learning for dimensionality reduction and visualisation. A key contribution is that the overall aggregated trading strategies are tested for statistical arbitrage using a novel hypothesis test proposed by Jarrow et al. (2012) on both daily sampled and intraday time-scales. The (low frequency) daily sampled strategies fail the arbitrage tests after costs, while the (high frequency) intraday sampled strategies are not falsified as statistical arbitrages after costs. The estimates of trading strategy success, cost of trading and slippage are considered along with an online benchmark portfolio algorithm for performance comparison. In addition, the algorithms generalisation error is analysed by recovering a probability of back-test overfitting estimate using a nonparametric procedure introduced by Bailey et al. (2016). The work aims to explore and better understand the interplay between different technical trading strategies from a data-informed perspective.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.