Fact-checking Initiatives in Bangladesh, India, and Nepal: A Study of User Engagement and Challenges

AI-generated keywords: Fake news Misinformation Developing countries Fact-checking initiatives User engagement

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Fake news and misinformation is a global problem
  • Developing countries like Bangladesh, India, and Nepal face more challenges in fighting against misinformation due to limited resources and technologies
  • A recent study by Md Mahfuzul Haque et al. aimed to understand the challenges faced by fact-checking initiatives in these three South Asian countries
  • The study involved in-depth interviews with senior editors from six fact-checking initiatives which revealed several challenges including lack of resources, technologies and political pressure
  • Despite these obstacles, an analysis of Facebook pages for these initiatives showed increasing user engagement with their posts
  • Fact-checking initiatives are important in combating misinformation and promoting accurate information in developing countries where access to reliable information can be limited
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Md Mahfuzul Haque, Mohammad Yousuf, Zahedur Arman, Md Main Uddin Rony, Ahmed Shatil Alam, Kazi Mehedi Hasan, Md Khadimul Islam, Naeemul Hassan

Abstract: Fake news and misinformation spread in developing countries as fast as they do in developed countries with increasing penetration of the internet and social media. However, fighting misinformation is more difficult in developing countries where resources and necessary technologies are scarce. This study provides an understanding of the challenges various fact-checking initiatives face in three South Asian countries--Bangladesh, India, and Nepal. In-depth interviews were conducted with senior editors of six fact-checking initiatives. Challenges identified include lack of resources, technologies, and political pressure. An analysis of Facebook pages of these initiatives shows increasing user engagement with their posts.

Submitted to arXiv on 05 Nov. 2018

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1811.01806v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The spread of fake news and misinformation is a global problem, affecting both developed and developing countries. In developing countries such as Bangladesh, India, and Nepal, the fight against misinformation is even more challenging due to limited resources and technologies. A recent study conducted by Md Mahfuzul Haque et al. aimed to understand the challenges faced by fact-checking initiatives in these three South Asian countries. The study involved in-depth interviews with senior editors from six fact-checking initiatives which revealed several challenges including lack of resources, technologies and political pressure. Despite these obstacles, an analysis of Facebook pages for these initiatives showed increasing user engagement with their posts. This highlights the importance of fact-checking initiatives in combating misinformation and promoting accurate information in developing countries where access to reliable information can be limited.
Created on 09 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.