Noise Contrastive Estimation for Scalable Linear Models for One-Class Collaborative Filtering
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- The paper proposes a novel method to improve the accuracy of one-class collaborative filtering methods.
- Existing scalable methods such as PLRec use fast randomized SVD to embed items into a latent space, but these often exhibit popularity bias that skews the ability to accurately embed niche items.
- The authors leverage insights from NCE to derive a closed-form, efficiently computable "depopularized" embedding called NCE-PLRec.
- NCE-PLRec uses improved item embedding of NCE while correcting for its popularity unbiasing in final recommendations through linear regression to learn personalized user models.
- Empirically, NCE-PLRec outperforms state-of-the-art methods as well as various ablations of itself on large-scale recommendation datasets.
- The proposed method provides uniform recommendations across all levels of popularity and addresses the issue of popularity bias in item embeddings.
Authors: Ga Wu, Maksims Volkovs, Chee Loong Soon, Scott Sanner, Himanshu Rai
Abstract: Previous highly scalable one-class collaborative filtering methods such as Projected Linear Recommendation (PLRec) have advocated using fast randomized SVD to embed items into a latent space, followed by linear regression methods to learn personalized recommendation models per user. Unfortunately, naive SVD embedding methods often exhibit a popularity bias that skews the ability to accurately embed niche items. To address this, we leverage insights from Noise Contrastive Estimation (NCE) to derive a closed-form, efficiently computable "depopularized" embedding. While this method is not ideal for direct recommendation using methods like PureSVD since popularity still plays an important role in recommendation, we find that embedding followed by linear regression to learn personalized user models in a novel method we call NCE-PLRec leverages the improved item embedding of NCE while correcting for its popularity unbiasing in final recommendations. An analysis of the recommendation popularity distribution demonstrates that NCE-PLRec uniformly distributes its recommendations over the popularity spectrum while other methods exhibit distinct biases towards specific popularity subranges, thus artificially restricting their recommendations. Empirically, NCE-PLRec outperforms state-of-the-art methods as well as various ablations of itself on a variety of large-scale recommendation datasets.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Welcome to our AI assistant! Here are some important things to keep in mind:
- The assistant will only answer questions related to this specific paper.
- Please note that this is not a bot for casual chatting.
- If you want the answer in a language other than the language you chose for navigating the website, simply add "TRANSLATE IN LANGUAGE L" at the end of your query (replace "LANGUAGE L" with the language of your choice).
- For example, you could ask "Can you extract the most important aspect of the paper? TRANSLATE IN SPANISH".
- If you want to keep the history of your questions/answers you should create an account.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through atree representation
Look for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.