Direct current resistivity with steel-cased wells

AI-generated keywords: Steel-cased wells DC resistivity survey Electrical methods Carbon capture and storage Hydraulic fracturing

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Electrical and electromagnetic methods are increasingly used in geoscience to solve problems with steel-cased wells.
  • Steel-cased wells pose serious environmental hazards, making it crucial to monitor carbon capture and storage as well as hydraulic fracturing operations.
  • Detecting flaws or breaks in degrading steel-casings is essential.
  • Success of a DC resistivity survey lies in the details, considering factors such as source and receiver geometry, physical properties, and measured data impact.
  • Accurate simulations are necessary due to small values of diagnostic signals, but this is computationally challenging because wells extend kilometers in depth but have millimeter variations in radial direction with extreme variation in electrical conductivity (typically 5-7 orders of magnitude between casing and background geology).
  • Several authors have demonstrated that steel-cased wells can be beneficial for detecting signal due to targets at depth.
  • Various approaches for successful simulation design account for all relevant parameters including source location within or outside the wellbore; physical properties; geometry; etc., enabling accurate interpretation of measured data from steel cased wells.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Lindsey J. Heagy, Douglas W. Oldenburg

arXiv: 1810.12446v2 - DOI (physics.geo-ph)
Geophysical Journal International

Abstract: The work in this paper is motivated by the increasing use of electrical and electromagnetic methods in geoscience problems where steel-cased wells are present. Applications of interest include monitoring carbon capture and storage and hydraulic fracturing operations, as well as detecting flaws or breaks in degrading steel-casings -- such wells pose serious environmental hazards. The general principles of electrical methods with steel-cased wells are understood, and several authors have demonstrated that the presence of steel-cased wells can be beneficial for detecting signal due to targets at depth. However, the success of a DC resistivity survey lies in the details. Secondary signals might only be a few percent of the primary signal. In designing a survey, the geometry of the source and receivers, and whether the source is at the top of the casing, inside of it, or beneath the casing will impact measured responses. Also the physical properties and geometry of the background geology, target, and casing will have a large impact on the measured data. Because of the small values of the diagnostic signals, it is important to understand the detailed physics of the problem and also to be able to carry out accurate simulations. This latter task is computationally challenging because of the extreme geometry of the wells, which extend kilometers in depth but have millimeter variations in the radial direction, and the extreme variation in the electrical conductivity (typically 5-7 orders of magnitude between the casing and the background geology).

Submitted to arXiv on 29 Oct. 2018

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1810.12446v2

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the field of geoscience, electrical and electromagnetic methods are increasingly being used to solve problems where steel-cased wells are present. These wells pose serious environmental hazards, making it crucial to monitor carbon capture and storage as well as hydraulic fracturing operations. Detecting flaws or breaks in degrading steel-casings is also essential. While the general principles of electrical methods with steel-cased wells are understood, the success of a DC resistivity survey lies in the details. Secondary signals might only be a few percent of the primary signal, and designing a survey requires considering factors such as the geometry of the source and receivers, whether the source is at the top of the casing, inside it, or beneath it, and how physical properties and geometry impact measured data. Accurate simulations are necessary due to small values of diagnostic signals. However, this task is computationally challenging because wells extend kilometers in depth but have millimeter variations in radial direction with extreme variation in electrical conductivity (typically 5-7 orders of magnitude between casing and background geology). In their paper "Direct current resistivity with steel-cased wells," Lindsey J. Heagy and Douglas W. Oldenburg explore these challenges further while highlighting how several authors have demonstrated that steel-cased wells can be beneficial for detecting signal due to targets at depth. They discuss various approaches for successful simulation design which account for all relevant parameters including source location within or outside the wellbore; physical properties; geometry; etc., thus enabling accurate interpretation of measured data from steel cased wells.
Created on 26 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.