Probabilistically Safe Robot Planning with Confidence-Based Human Predictions

AI-generated keywords: Robot Planning Human Predictions Bayesian Framework Trajectory Planning Safety Certificate

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • The paper addresses the challenges of safely operating robots around humans
  • Predictive models of human motion can be employed to ensure safety
  • Simplifying assumptions in these models can lead to degraded predictions and pose a risk to safety
  • The authors propose a real-time Bayesian framework that allows robots to modulate their predictions based on the model's confidence in predicting human behavior
  • The approach combines worst-case tracking error guarantees for physical robots with probabilistic time-varying human predictions to generate assured autonomous robot motion and yield a quantitative, probabilistic safety certificate
  • The approach is demonstrated using a quadcopter navigating around a human and highlights that rational human actions under a particular model can serve as an indicator of its ability to describe current motion and improve prediction accuracy while ensuring safety.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Jaime F. Fisac, Andrea Bajcsy, Sylvia L. Herbert, David Fridovich-Keil, Steven Wang, Claire J. Tomlin, Anca D. Dragan

Robotics Science and Systems (RSS) 2018

Abstract: In order to safely operate around humans, robots can employ predictive models of human motion. Unfortunately, these models cannot capture the full complexity of human behavior and necessarily introduce simplifying assumptions. As a result, predictions may degrade whenever the observed human behavior departs from the assumed structure, which can have negative implications for safety. In this paper, we observe that how "rational" human actions appear under a particular model can be viewed as an indicator of that model's ability to describe the human's current motion. By reasoning about this model confidence in a real-time Bayesian framework, we show that the robot can very quickly modulate its predictions to become more uncertain when the model performs poorly. Building on recent work in provably-safe trajectory planning, we leverage these confidence-aware human motion predictions to generate assured autonomous robot motion. Our new analysis combines worst-case tracking error guarantees for the physical robot with probabilistic time-varying human predictions, yielding a quantitative, probabilistic safety certificate. We demonstrate our approach with a quadcopter navigating around a human.

Submitted to arXiv on 31 May. 2018

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1806.00109v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The paper titled "Probabilistically Safe Robot Planning with Confidence-Based Human Predictions" addresses the challenges of safely operating robots around humans. To ensure safety, predictive models of human motion can be employed; however, these models often introduce simplifying assumptions that cannot capture the full complexity of human behavior. This can lead to degraded predictions when observed human behavior deviates from the assumed structure and poses a risk to safety. To address this issue, the authors propose a real-time Bayesian framework that allows robots to modulate their predictions based on the model's confidence in predicting human behavior. By leveraging recent work in provably-safe trajectory planning and combining worst-case tracking error guarantees for physical robots with probabilistic time-varying human predictions, the authors generate assured autonomous robot motion and yield a quantitative, probabilistic safety certificate. The approach is demonstrated using a quadcopter navigating around a human and highlights that rational human actions under a particular model can serve as an indicator of its ability to describe current motion and improve prediction accuracy while ensuring safety.
Created on 12 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.