APR: Architectural Pattern Recommender

Authors: Shipra Sharma, Balwinder Sodhi

Sharma, S., & Sodhi, B. (2017, April). APR: architectural pattern recommender. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 1225-1230). ACM
6 Pages, 1 Figure. Published in SAC 2017 in Software Engineering Track

Abstract: This paper proposes Architectural Pattern Recommender (APR) system which helps in such architecture selection process. Main contribution of this work is in replacing the manual effort required to identify and analyse relevant architectural patterns in context of a particular set of software requirements. Key input to APR is a set of architecturally significant use cases concerning the application being developed. Central idea of APR's design is two folds: a) transform the unstructured information about software architecture design into a structured form which is suitable for recognizing textual entailment between a requirement scenario and a potential architectural pattern. b) leverage the rich experiential knowledge embedded in discussions on professional developer support forums such as Stackoverflow to check the sentiment about a design decision. APR makes use of both the above elements to identify a suitable architectural pattern and assess its suitability for a given set of requirements. Efficacy of APR has been evaluated by comparing its recommendations for "ground truth" scenarios (comprising of applications whose architecture is well known).

Submitted to arXiv on 23 Mar. 2018

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1803.08666v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The summary is not ready yet
Created on 27 May. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.