How Software Development Group Leaders Influence Team Members Behavior
AI-generated Key Points
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.
- Exploratory and exploitative innovation strategies are important for competitiveness in software development companies.
- Leaders have a significant influence on innovative behavior within teams.
- A leadership style that combines transactional and transformational practices is more likely to produce effective results in supporting innovative behavior.
- Project managers and other group leaders should be stimulated and supported in adopting such practices to create the conditions for innovative behavior to thrive within software development teams.
- Leadership styles should encourage team members to take risks, experiment with new ideas, and collaborate effectively while also maintaining focus on achieving specific goals.
- Creating an environment where risk-taking is encouraged and collaboration is valued can foster an atmosphere conducive to creative problem solving and successful implementation of new ideas.
Authors: Fabio Q. B. da Silva, Cleviton V. F. Monteiro, Igor Ebrahim dos Santos, Luiz Fernando Capretz
Abstract: Evidence in the literature from several business sectors shows that exploratory and exploitative innovation strategies are complementarily important for competitiveness. Our empirical findings reinforced those evidences in the context of software development companies. The innovative behaviour of individuals is an essential ingredient to success in both types of innovations strategies and leaders can have a big influence on this behaviour. Adopting a leadership style that combines transactional and transformational practices is more likely to produce effective results in supporting innovative behaviour. In software development, project managers and other group leaders should be stimulated and supported in adopting such practices to create the conditions for innovative behaviour to thrive.
Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant
You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.
⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.
Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting
Score: 0
Why do we need votes?
Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.
The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.
⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.
Similar papers summarized with our AI tools
Navigate through even more similar papers through a
tree representationLook for similar papers (in beta version)
By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.
Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.