Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1711.05251v1

The study conducted a bibliometric analysis of publications co-written by authors affiliated with Ukrainian and Russian institutions between 2007-2016, according to Scopus. The results showed that despite the Russian military intervention in Ukraine, Ukrainian and Russian scientists have not refused to carry out joint research in major international projects. However, there was a decrease in the number of works written by Ukrainian and Russian scientific institutions staff members in 2016, indicating the negative impact of the conflict on cooperation in science. The study also highlighted the importance of generating science development programs in Ukraine and conducting further research on factors that encourage Ukrainian researchers to work with international partners and sources of funding for joint research. Additionally, the study found that out of 7,840 documents co-authored by Ukrainian and Russian scholars during this period, only 3,631 were published by researchers from both countries' R&D institutions. The largest share of these joint works included researchers from the USA, France, Poland, Italy, and Great Britain. These findings are crucial for policymakers interested in developing international academic cooperation and improving domestic research quality. They can use this information to create initiatives aimed at strengthening collaboration between Ukrainian and Russian scientists as well as increasing opportunities for international partnerships. Furthermore, they can use these results to identify potential sources of funding for joint research projects between both countries’ R&D institutions.

• - The study analyzed publications co-written by authors affiliated with Ukrainian and Russian institutions between 2007-2016, according to Scopus.
• - Despite the Russian military intervention in Ukraine, Ukrainian and Russian scientists have not refused to carry out joint research in major international projects.
• - There was a decrease in the number of works written by Ukrainian and Russian scientific institutions staff members in 2016, indicating the negative impact of the conflict on cooperation in science.
• - Generating science development programs in Ukraine is important as well as conducting further research on factors that encourage Ukrainian researchers to work with international partners and sources of funding for joint research.
• - Out of 7,840 documents co-authored by Ukrainian and Russian scholars during this period, only 3,631 were published by researchers from both countries' R&D institutions.
• - The largest share of these joint works included researchers from the USA, France, Poland, Italy, and Great Britain.
• - These findings are crucial for policymakers interested in developing international academic cooperation and improving domestic research quality.
• - They can use this information to create initiatives aimed at strengthening collaboration between Ukrainian and Russian scientists as well as increasing opportunities for international partnerships.
• - Furthermore, they can use these results to identify potential sources of funding for joint research projects between both countries’ R&D institutions.

Summary: The study looked at papers written by scientists from Ukraine and Russia between 2007-2016. Even though there was a conflict between the two countries, they still worked together on some projects. However, there were fewer joint papers in 2016 because of the conflict. It's important to encourage Ukrainian researchers to work with others and find funding for joint research. Only about half of the papers were co-authored by both Ukrainian and Russian scientists, with many other countries also involved. Definitions: - Affiliated: connected or associated with - Intervention: when one country gets involved in another country's affairs - Cooperation: working together - Development programs: plans to help something grow or improve - R&D institutions: places where research and development is done (e.g. universities, labs)

Exploring the Impact of Conflict on Ukrainian-Russian Scientific Collaboration

In recent years, the conflict between Ukraine and Russia has had a significant impact on international relations. This includes scientific collaboration between both countries, which is an important factor in advancing research and development (R&D). To explore this issue further, a study was conducted to analyze publications co-written by authors affiliated with Ukrainian and Russian institutions from 2007 to 2016 using Scopus. The results of this bibliometric analysis are crucial for policymakers interested in developing international academic cooperation and improving domestic research quality.

Decrease in Joint Publications

The study found that despite the Russian military intervention in Ukraine, scientists from both countries have not refused to carry out joint research projects. However, there was a decrease in the number of works written by Ukrainian and Russian scientific institutions staff members in 2016 compared to previous years. This indicates that the conflict has had a negative impact on cooperation in science between these two nations.

International Partnerships

Out of 7,840 documents co-authored by Ukrainian and Russian scholars during this period, only 3,631 were published by researchers from both countries' R&D institutions. The largest share of these joint works included researchers from the USA, France, Poland, Italy, and Great Britain. These findings demonstrate how important it is for both countries to generate science development programs as well as increase opportunities for international partnerships with other nations’ R&D institutions.

Sources of Funding

The study also highlighted the importance of conducting further research on factors that encourage Ukrainian researchers to work with international partners as well as sources of funding for joint research projects between both countries’ R&D institutions. This information can be used by policymakers when creating initiatives aimed at strengthening collaboration between Ukrainian and Russian scientists as well as increasing opportunities for international collaborations with other nations’ R&D institutions. In conclusion, this bibliometric analysis provides valuable insights into how conflict affects scientific collaboration between Ukraine and Russia over time. It also reveals potential sources of funding for joint research projects between both countries’ R&D institutions which could help strengthen their partnership even further despite political tensions that exist today.