Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences

AI-generated keywords: Reinforcement Learning Human Preferences Trajectory Segments Atari Games Robot Locomotion

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Reinforcement learning (RL) has made significant progress, but communicating complex goals to RL systems remains a challenge.
  • Researchers led by Paul Christiano and Jan Leike have developed an innovative approach to this problem in their study titled "Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences."
  • The method involves defining goals based on non-expert human preferences between pairs of trajectory segments.
  • By providing feedback on less than one percent of the agent's interactions with the environment, they were able to reduce the cost of human oversight enough that it could be practically applied to state-of-the-art RL systems.
  • This approach was effective in solving complex RL tasks without access to the reward function, including Atari games and simulated robot locomotion.
  • The approach is flexible and can handle considerably more complex behaviors and environments than any previously learned from human feedback.
  • The authors note that their work has important implications for developing sophisticated RL systems that can interact usefully with real-world environments.
  • This approach may help pave the way for advances in fields such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, and more.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Paul Christiano, Jan Leike, Tom B. Brown, Miljan Martic, Shane Legg, Dario Amodei

Abstract: For sophisticated reinforcement learning (RL) systems to interact usefully with real-world environments, we need to communicate complex goals to these systems. In this work, we explore goals defined in terms of (non-expert) human preferences between pairs of trajectory segments. We show that this approach can effectively solve complex RL tasks without access to the reward function, including Atari games and simulated robot locomotion, while providing feedback on less than one percent of our agent's interactions with the environment. This reduces the cost of human oversight far enough that it can be practically applied to state-of-the-art RL systems. To demonstrate the flexibility of our approach, we show that we can successfully train complex novel behaviors with about an hour of human time. These behaviors and environments are considerably more complex than any that have been previously learned from human feedback.

Submitted to arXiv on 12 Jun. 2017

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1706.03741v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

The field of reinforcement learning (RL) has made significant strides in recent years, but one major challenge remains: how to communicate complex goals to RL systems so that they can interact effectively with real-world environments. In a new study titled "Deep Reinforcement Learning from Human Preferences," a team of researchers led by Paul Christiano and Jan Leike explore an innovative approach to this problem. Their method involves defining goals in terms of non-expert human preferences between pairs of trajectory segments. By providing feedback on less than one percent of the agent's interactions with the environment, they were able to reduce the cost of human oversight enough that it could be practically applied to state-of-the-art RL systems. This approach was shown to be effective in solving complex RL tasks without access to the reward function, including Atari games and simulated robot locomotion. One key advantage of this approach is its flexibility. The researchers were able to successfully train complex novel behaviors with about an hour of human time, demonstrating that their method can handle considerably more complex behaviors and environments than any previously learned from human feedback. The authors note that their work has important implications for developing sophisticated RL systems that can interact usefully with real-world environments. By enabling humans to communicate complex goals more effectively, this approach may help pave the way for advances in fields such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, and more.
Created on 07 Apr. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.