Higher rank lamplighter groups are graph automatic

AI-generated keywords: Higher rank lamplighter groups Graph automaticity Wreath products Geometric group theory Combinatorial group theory

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • Higher rank lamplighter groups (Diestel-Leader groups $\Gamma_d(q)$ for $d \geq 3$) are graph automatic
  • Graph automaticity is a fundamental notion in algorithmic group theory
  • Previous research focused on automatic groups, but this study introduces a new family of graph automatic groups that are not automatic
  • The authors provide a detailed analysis and proof of the graph automaticity of higher rank lamplighter groups
  • These groups arise from studying the actions of certain infinite wreath products on rooted trees
  • Techniques from geometric group theory and combinatorial group theory are leveraged to establish the desired result
  • The discovery has significant implications for understanding the structural properties and computational aspects of higher rank lamplighter groups
  • The findings contribute to advancing our knowledge of graph automaticity and its applications in mathematics and computer science
  • This paper presents a novel approach to studying the automorphism properties of an intriguing class of groups
  • The results open up new avenues for further exploration in both theoretical and practical aspects of group theory.
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Sophie Bérubé, Tara Palnitkar, Jennifer Taback

Abstract: We show that the higher rank lamplighter groups, or Diestel-Leader groups $\Gamma_d(q)$ for $d \geq 3$, are graph automatic. This introduces a new family of graph automatic groups which are not automatic.

Submitted to arXiv on 08 Jun. 2017

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1706.02635v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In their paper titled "Higher rank lamplighter groups are graph automatic," Sophie Bérubé, Tara Palnitkar, and Jennifer Taback present a significant result in the field of group theory. They demonstrate that the higher rank lamplighter groups, also known as Diestel-Leader groups $\Gamma_d(q)$ for $d \geq 3$, are graph automatic. The concept of graph automaticity is a fundamental notion in algorithmic group theory. It characterizes groups that can be recognized by finite-state automata acting on labeled graphs. While previous research has focused on automatic groups, this study introduces a new family of graph automatic groups that are not automatic. The authors provide a detailed analysis and proof of the graph automaticity of higher rank lamplighter groups. These groups arise from studying the actions of certain infinite wreath products on rooted trees. By leveraging techniques from geometric group theory and combinatorial group theory, they establish the desired result. This discovery has significant implications for understanding the structural properties and computational aspects of higher rank lamplighter groups. The authors' findings contribute to advancing our knowledge of graph automaticity and its applications in various areas of mathematics and computer science. Overall, this paper sheds light on an intriguing class of groups and presents a novel approach to studying their automorphism properties. The results presented by Bérubé, Palnitkar, and Taback open up new avenues for further exploration in both theoretical and practical aspects of group theory.
Created on 16 Jul. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.