## Efficient estimation in the Topp-Leone distribution

### AI-generated Key Points

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

- The paper explores efficient methods for estimating the probability density function and cumulative distribution function of the Topp-Leone distribution.
- The maximum likelihood estimator is derived using numerical optimization techniques such as Newton-Raphson method or Fisher scoring algorithm.
- The uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator is obtained by solving a system of equations involving moments of the distribution.
- The percentile estimator uses percentiles of order statistics to estimate parameters while the least squares and weighted least squares estimators minimize sum of squared differences between observed values and expected values.
- A simulation study is conducted to compare the efficiency of these estimators using Monte Carlo simulations with different sample sizes ranging from 50 to 5000 observations.
- The results show that the maximum likelihood estimator performs better than other estimators in terms of mean squared error (MSE) and bias.
- This paper provides valuable insights into efficient estimation methods for Topp-Leone distributions that can be useful in various applications where this distribution is used.

**Authors:**
Lazhar Benkhelifa

**Abstract:** In the current paper, the estimation of the probability density function and the cumulative distribution function of the Topp-Leone distribution is considered. We derive the following estimators: maximum likelihood estimator, uniformly minimum variance unbiased estimator, percentile estimator, least squares estimator and weighted least squares estimator. A simulation study shows that the maximum likelihood estimator is more efficient than the others estimators.

### Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

⚠The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

**Why do we need votes?**

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

⚠The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

## Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation**Look for similar papers (in beta version)**

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

**Disclaimer:** The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.