SoK: Applying Machine Learning in Security - A Survey

AI-generated keywords: Machine Learning Security Taxonomy Game Theory Challenges

AI-generated Key Points

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the key points are generated using the paper metadata rather than the full article.

  • ML for security purposes has been around for nearly three decades
  • Increasing availability of data and growing ubiquity of information and communications lead to a rise in security risks
  • Research on applying ML algorithms and systems to address security concerns has rapidly expanded
  • Areas of research include intrusion detection systems (IDS), malware classification, security policy management (SPM), and information leak checking
  • The authors systematically study academic publications from 2008 to 2015 that applied ML techniques in security domains
  • They develop a taxonomy categorizing ML paradigms based on their application to different security domains
  • They outline open challenges and upcoming areas of research within the field
  • They suggest treating security as a game theory problem rather than relying solely on batch-trained ML approaches
  • The paper provides valuable insights into the application of ML in security domains
Also access our AI generated: Comprehensive summary, Lay summary, Blog-like article; or ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant.

Authors: Heju Jiang, Jasvir Nagra, Parvez Ahammad

18 pages, 2 figures, 11 tables

Abstract: The idea of applying machine learning(ML) to solve problems in security domains is almost 3 decades old. As information and communications grow more ubiquitous and more data become available, many security risks arise as well as appetite to manage and mitigate such risks. Consequently, research on applying and designing ML algorithms and systems for security has grown fast, ranging from intrusion detection systems(IDS) and malware classification to security policy management(SPM) and information leak checking. In this paper, we systematically study the methods, algorithms, and system designs in academic publications from 2008-2015 that applied ML in security domains. 98 percent of the surveyed papers appeared in the 6 highest-ranked academic security conferences and 1 conference known for pioneering ML applications in security. We examine the generalized system designs, underlying assumptions, measurements, and use cases in active research. Our examinations lead to 1) a taxonomy on ML paradigms and security domains for future exploration and exploitation, and 2) an agenda detailing open and upcoming challenges. Based on our survey, we also suggest a point of view that treats security as a game theory problem instead of a batch-trained ML problem.

Submitted to arXiv on 10 Nov. 2016

Ask questions about this paper to our AI assistant

You can also chat with multiple papers at once here.

The license of the paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the AI assistant only knows about the paper metadata rather than the full article.

AI assistant instructions?

Results of the summarizing process for the arXiv paper: 1611.03186v1

This paper's license doesn't allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing process is here made with the paper's metadata rather than the article.

In the paper titled "SoK: Applying Machine Learning in Security - A Survey," authors Heju Jiang, Jasvir Nagra, and Parvez Ahammad explore the application of machine learning (ML) in solving security problems. They highlight that the concept of using ML for security purposes has been around for nearly three decades. With the increasing availability of data and the growing ubiquity of information and communications, there is a corresponding rise in security risks. This has led to a greater interest in managing and mitigating these risks. The authors note that research on applying ML algorithms and systems to address security concerns has rapidly expanded. This research encompasses various areas such as intrusion detection systems (IDS), malware classification, security policy management (SPM), and information leak checking. To gain insights into this field, the authors systematically study academic publications from 2008 to 2015 that applied ML techniques in security domains. Their analysis focuses on papers presented at highly ranked academic security conferences, as well as one conference known for pioneering ML applications in security. By examining the methods, algorithms, system designs, underlying assumptions, measurements, and use cases presented in these publications, the authors aim to provide a comprehensive understanding of current research trends. Based on their survey findings, the authors propose two key outcomes. Firstly, they develop a taxonomy that categorizes ML paradigms based on their application to different security domains. This taxonomy serves as a foundation for future exploration and exploitation of ML techniques in security contexts. Secondly, they outline an agenda that highlights open challenges and upcoming areas of research within this field. The identified challenges can guide researchers towards addressing critical issues related to applying ML in security effectively. Additionally, the authors suggest a novel perspective on treating security as a game theory problem rather than solely relying on batch-trained ML approaches. This viewpoint opens up new avenues for exploring innovative solutions by leveraging concepts from game theory. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the application of ML in security domains. It offers a comprehensive analysis of existing research literature; presents a taxonomy for future exploration; outlines key challenges and opportunities for further investigation; and suggests an alternative approach based on game theory principles which could lead to more effective solutions when applied to certain scenarios involving machine learning models used for cybersecurity purposes.
Created on 25 Dec. 2023

Assess the quality of the AI-generated content by voting

Score: 0

Why do we need votes?

Votes are used to determine whether we need to re-run our summarizing tools. If the count reaches -10, our tools can be restarted.

The previous summary was created more than a year ago and can be re-run (if necessary) by clicking on the Run button below.

The license of this specific paper does not allow us to build upon its content and the summarizing tools will be run using the paper metadata rather than the full article. However, it still does a good job, and you can also try our tools on papers with more open licenses.

Similar papers summarized with our AI tools

Navigate through even more similar papers through a

tree representation

Look for similar papers (in beta version)

By clicking on the button above, our algorithm will scan all papers in our database to find the closest based on the contents of the full papers and not just on metadata. Please note that it only works for papers that we have generated summaries for and you can rerun it from time to time to get a more accurate result while our database grows.

Disclaimer: The AI-based summarization tool and virtual assistant provided on this website may not always provide accurate and complete summaries or responses. We encourage you to carefully review and evaluate the generated content to ensure its quality and relevance to your needs.